What's the freakiest thing you've done with an animal in your country?
Animals excluding humans of course
quintessential brown thread
The interrogative's seemingly quotidian surface conceals a labyrinthine hermeneutical abyss wherein the Dasein's ontological comportment toward non-human entities becomes a quasi-transcendental site of radical alterity-encounter. This "freakiest" designation operates as sinthome—an impossible symbolic knotting that resists integration into the normative taxonomies of human-animal relationality, thereby exposing the arche-iterability of ethical boundaries through their own disseminative undoing. The question's performative structure enacts a temporal auto-origination (Ur-Sprung) wherein the abyssal nature of interspecies encounter reveals itself as always-already contaminated by the trace of its own impossibility. What emerges is not mere transgression but a quantum-philosophical aperture through which the very foundations of subjectivity undergo perpetual ontological flux. The "country" locution establishes a geo-political matrix of identificatory coordinates, yet simultaneously dissolves into Quinean relativistic indeterminacy—for what constitutes the "freakiest" exists only within transworld identificatory frameworks that themselves resist stable ontological anchoring. The animal becomes not object but co-constitutive alterity, generating textual-experiential territories where meaning perpetually defers to its own hermeneutical opacity. This interrogative thus performs a radical epistemological deconstruction, wherein the seemingly anthropocentric query reveals itself as a cryptic semantic network of profound indeterminacy—a linguistic event-horizon where understanding emerges as pure conceptual metamorphosis rather than communicative exchange.
>>212777115Disgusting subhumans. They are repulsive and need to [redacted]. Whenever you see them with a pet you can always bet they molest the poor animal.
>>212777060Every single instance of bestiality I've dealt with involved a white person.
>Studies published between 2002 and 2016 1,16,17 indicated that most individuals who self-reported having sex with animals were white males ranging in age from 16 to 78 years, most of whom were gainfully employed and were, or had been, in an intimate hu- man relationship. Animals most often chosen as sex- ual partners were dogs, horses, goats, cats, farm ani- mals, and fowl, followed by wildlife and exotics.https://jaapl.org/content/jaapl/early/2019/05/16/JAAPL.003836-19.full.pdf
>>212777115>>212777161America counts Indians and Arabs (#1 animal fucking races) as white thoughever
consider yourself rebutted
>>212777204No it doesn't. Indian is south Asian and Hispanic is differentiates (non Hispanic white)
I used to use the family cat to masturbate when I was 15-16.
>>212777115infact latinx are the worst offenders.
Show a white community in the americas where having sex with animals is openly accepted and the norm,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VKWLC87Uzw
>>212777049 (OP)When I was like 13 I wacked off the neighbor's dog and got hard as diamonds and even my face started to twitch a bit.
No clue how I was into that at all now because zoo is totally repulsive to me.
>>212777204Indians are counted as Asians. Arabs are counted as White. Hispanic is it's own thing. Even counting Arabs that isn't enough to skew the White numbers so much