>>212882000I wish
>>212882032>where do you find these pictures? I have them saved for so many years that I honestly don’t remember.
>Any book recommendation about the topic?No tempo dos bandeirantes; Belmonte e A Culinária Caipira da Paulistânia; Carlos Alberto Doria.
Viagem à Província de São Paulo; Augeste de Saint-Hilaire
Viagem pelo Brasil; Spix e Martius
O Folklore dos Bandeirantes; Joaquim Ribeiro
Os parceiros do Rio Bonito; Antônio Cândido
Territorialidades Caipiras, o ser e a Identidade do Lugar
O Território Paulistânico: um olhar existencial para além dos mapas antigos; Vitor Sartori, Jane Cordova, Victal
Música Caipira e Enraizamento; Ivan Vilela
Vivências caipiras: pluralidade cultural e diferentes temporalidades na terra paulista; Maria Alice Setúbal
>>212882068I never hard about this martial art, but ponchos indeed were used to hide weapons, hence the frequent crimes that kept multiplying. It is then that the governor, Dom Rodrigo Cezar de Menezes (a Portuguese official), expressly prohibited its use in 1723: ‘no person may henceforth wear, neither by day nor by night, a hood on their head, and whoever does so shall be imprisoned for two months in the city jail and shall pay a fine of twenty thousand réis and shall lose the hood.' This law was a repetition of the 1640 law that also banned ponchos. But despite this, they still could not take the ponchos from the Paulistas, for ten years later, there was a new prohibition. Two more bans were issued in the following years, but they also failed. Given all these laws and penalties, the use of poncho should have disappeared; however, it is easier to make laws than to undo habits. In 1775, it was banned once again—this time for women.