Anonymous
7/24/2025, 4:15:40 AM No.213080826
>tallest peak in UK
>4400 feet
LOL
>4400 feet
LOL
Replies:
Thread 213080826 - /int/ [Archived: 28 hours ago]
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 4:19:24 AM No.213080881
we bloody need to get India back to reach the Himalayas again or however ancient artifacts are stolen
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 4:27:12 AM No.213080998
>>213080826 (OP)
That just an extension of the Appalachian mountains
That just an extension of the Appalachian mountains
Replies:
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 4:28:35 AM No.213081019
>>213080998
The Appalachian mountains are an extension of the Scottish-Norwegian mountain range.
The Appalachian mountains are an extension of the Scottish-Norwegian mountain range.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 4:29:36 AM No.213081035
>>213081019
america is #1 therefore its an extension of Appalachia, sorry you limey bastard, i dont make the rules
america is #1 therefore its an extension of Appalachia, sorry you limey bastard, i dont make the rules
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 4:39:27 AM No.213081170
>Scots ended up just moving to another mountain chain in the same geological formation in West Virginia
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 4:42:45 AM No.213081229
It's mogged by Mount Mitchell
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 5:06:27 AM No.213081579
>>213080826 (OP)
That part of the UK is still gorgeous, I think they're just the perfect size to be their own unique kind of awesome appearance. Much love to my Bong brethren across the seas, our mountains here in Australia are also pretty pathetic compared to New Zealand's.
That part of the UK is still gorgeous, I think they're just the perfect size to be their own unique kind of awesome appearance. Much love to my Bong brethren across the seas, our mountains here in Australia are also pretty pathetic compared to New Zealand's.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 7:05:00 AM No.213083296
>>213080826 (OP)
And looks cool as fuck.
And looks cool as fuck.
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 8:52:39 AM No.213084737
Replies:
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 10:11:49 AM No.213086037
>>213080826 (OP)
It is beautiful and epic. Higher or lower does not mean, in any case, geographic beauty. For example, in the Andes Mountains there are mountains above 6,000 meters high and yet they are aesthetically questionable (not to say “ugly”) and also deserted.
On the other hand, I believe that the experience of enjoyment would be MUCH greater in Tiny Niche, than above 6,000 meters in desert mountains...even for trained mountaineers that geographic panorama of great altitude and aridity is a real physical and mental sacrifice....
It is beautiful and epic. Higher or lower does not mean, in any case, geographic beauty. For example, in the Andes Mountains there are mountains above 6,000 meters high and yet they are aesthetically questionable (not to say “ugly”) and also deserted.
On the other hand, I believe that the experience of enjoyment would be MUCH greater in Tiny Niche, than above 6,000 meters in desert mountains...even for trained mountaineers that geographic panorama of great altitude and aridity is a real physical and mental sacrifice....
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 10:26:39 AM No.213086327
>>213080902
it's not a hill.
it's not a hill.
Russian
7/24/2025, 10:28:35 AM No.213086364
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 10:46:25 AM No.213086731
>>213086288
it's all england
it's all england
Anonymous
7/24/2025, 10:51:43 AM No.213086829
>>213080826 (OP)
It is beautiful and epic.
I'll be honest: higher or lower does not mean, in any case, geographic beauty. For example, in the Andes Mountains there are mountains above 6,000 meters high and yet they are aesthetically questionable (or downright ugly) and also deserted.
On the other hand, I believe that the experience of enjoyment would be much greater in Ben Nevis, than above 6,000 meters in desert mountains...even for trained mountaineers that geographic panorama of high altitude and aridity is a real mental and physical sacrifice.
It is beautiful and epic.
I'll be honest: higher or lower does not mean, in any case, geographic beauty. For example, in the Andes Mountains there are mountains above 6,000 meters high and yet they are aesthetically questionable (or downright ugly) and also deserted.
On the other hand, I believe that the experience of enjoyment would be much greater in Ben Nevis, than above 6,000 meters in desert mountains...even for trained mountaineers that geographic panorama of high altitude and aridity is a real mental and physical sacrifice.