>>213173576>clearly not given how many people still think industrialization is still some kind of inherent goodI mean a lot of people is simply okay with the "pleasure box" outcome that is logical to the amplification of the state and capitalism as result of industrialization
The outcome will be some brave new world shit imo
"Zog" homunculi in a hand created industrialy vs actual humans.
Or maybe we reach AI sigularity and it get rids of us before.
>>213173683Wdym im not even a moralist, im more of a materialist (truth to be told i obsess with Hermes, the god, but i do it for larp reasons), if you check the norway is rich thread i precisely said something across the lines of "abundance is unironically bad because we are animals and the presence of unlimited resorcrs creates permission structures that allow otherwise noxious behaviours, ideas and thing to thrive -and replicate-*
Is an idea i had for long
Look at "liberalism" or feminism
Those two things would lead to instant destruction on a scarcity conditioned society, however, since we live in abundance such ideas are allowed to thrive, survive and even reproduce (partly because we now also have means to store and reproduce them such as screens and recording)