>>213408036 Von der Leyen dropped the ball on tariff negotiations and the EU will be subservient to the American empire for at least another quarter century.
>>213407987 (OP) >>213408419 Regardless of Von der Leyen's total fuckup, don't the EU member states still have to approve the deal? Is it possible, for example, that France wouldn't approve it?
>>213408706 >Where an international agreement falls under exclusive EU competence, there is no need for EU countries to ratify it IIRC trade agreements are one of the rare cases where EU doesn't need ratification from every member state