>>213582899>anyway why dont we have better metricsI just think the problem is that we've tried to quantify something that isn't really quantifiable. The reason why intelligence is beautiful is due to how vast it is anon, it covers such a wide topic of things that have been accumulated for over thousands of centuries. How are we supposed to simply claim that some random person is this intelligent through a basic test?
I feel like when people focus on intelligence they think too narrow-minded; they only think of doctors, engineers and lawyers. What about the the artists during the renaissance or some of the greatest poets, warlords and leaders? So much ingenuity gets tossed aside because "muh hecklin digit is higher than urs you redditor."