1. Your country
2. Is your country renationalising its trains?

1. Flag
2. Yes

It makes no sense to privitise crucial public transport, since for-profit companies will obviously prioritise profits over service quality and accessibility.

>>213831938 (OP)
I'm amazed they didn't call it Yookay railways

>>213831938 (OP)
let's see how it goes

ours is national but still profit driven, it's total dogshit too

>>213831938 (OP)
Russia
No, all trains are owned by a state company anyways

>>213831938 (OP)
>Corrupt state owned nationalized railways
Yeah your descent into the third world is coming together, all you need now is a nationalized domestic fuel provider

>>213831938 (OP)
In the EU there's "competitive market rules" that force countries to have separate companies for the tracks and separate companies for the trains

99% of our rails are owned by one state company

When it comes to operators, there's Polregio which is state owned and provides regional service all across the country but it's badly managed so all the bigger voivodeships (provinces) decided to launch their own local gov-owned regional railway operators, see pic (map is 10 years outdated)

Technically it's an open bidding process to run the regional trains but that only happens in practice voivodeships which are too small and poor to make their own operator

>>213831938 (OP)
you can't privatise existing public railways.
the japanese and hkers have private metro lines and they work because they're land developers

>>213832744
>>213831938 (OP)
only the freight market is full of many private companies and some state ones too. like the oil and gas companies have their own opertors

My socialist shithole owns all of our trains yes
The high speed rail should all be privatized at the very least

>>213832886
shure you can.
>railway is public aka goverment owned
>goverment gives railway service to however they see fit