Speedrun to extinction: any %

>>213834768 (OP)
>le trad Poland
>abortions banned
>lowest fertility rate spare Ukraine (for obvious reasons)
kek

If everyone's birthrates are dropping, what is the problem exactly?
Earth is clearly overpopulated.

>>213834791
Can you blame them? Simon Mol infected literally thousands of prime aged polish women with HIV.

>>213834820
paying 60% of your income for the three retirees you finance

what happens in Kosovo?

>>213834820
Sweden isn't overpopulated.

>>213834820
You dont want to live in a 80% black world

>>213834820
Problem is they aren't dropping in africa and south asia enough

the goyim can't breed lol

>>213834768 (OP)
Not our heckin' infinite growth.

>>213834768 (OP)
BILLIONS MUST NEVER BE BORN

>>213834928
was watching a documentary on the settlers and they’re truly something out of the 16th century. how can anyone not see it

>>213834820
>what is the problem exactly?
They'll have to pay people higher wages.

>>213834891
it actually kind of is
90% of our population lives in the souther 1/3rd of the country
electricity production and drinking water is becoming a problem

>>213834912
but they are dropping and they are dropping rapidly
a part of me is starting to believe that this isn't about progress and becoming richer = having less kids
i think plastic pollution is actively changing humans but no one wants to sound the alarm about it because everyone is already damaged by it and it would just create global chaos

>>213834843
Just let them die, not my problem if they didnt want to have children

>>213835074
> electricity production
Nuclear energy.
> drinking water
You can't be serious.

>>213834977
Surrounded by Muslims who want them gone + Holocaust PTSD + strong in-group preference = breedmaxxing
Modern life is both too soft and unsustainable for people to have children and tangible existential threats should be prayed for

Nice, the world would be cozier with a couple of million people.

>>213834843
Euthanasia is becoming normalised. I think in another generation or two it will be common for old people to be euthanised when they start becoming a too big burden on relatives and the state with the same justification we use for euthanising sick and old pets. I am 99% sure my grandfather was effectively euthanised by a doctor in the hospital by giving him an overdose of some medication because it was a mercy instead of letting him keep wasting away from cancer for another couple of weeks.

>>213835135
Just live in the pod and die of radiation poisoning, so your country can have 200 million people.

>>213835074
>drinking water is becoming a problem
This is an issue with production and not available resources. Only about 5% of the water supply of Mälaren gets used as drinking water for Stockholm because this country has become a capitalistmaxxing shithole where only the bare minimum is invested in infrastructure.

>>213834843
Unironically a self imposed problem, just stop giving them pensions and free doctors appointments. What are they gonna do about it?

Why would I care again?

>>213835255
vote for the parties that support this (CDU and SPD)

>>213834768 (OP)
HOLY SHIT!
If this continues without change for another 7000 years we be completely extinct!

>>213835211
> German immediately thinks of packing everyone in the camps/pods
Jokes write themselves.
Aside that, i live in the place that has a nuclear plant and we don't have poisoning.

>>213835619
It is true that when done correctly, nuclear energy is fantastic. But the more reactors we have, the more likely it is that at least one of them will suffer catastrophic failure, even for engineering malpractice alone. Like, it's very difficult to agree that nuclear energy is safe when the argument comes from a nation that casually poisoned half of Europe and then pretended that nothing happened.

>>213835842
Chernobyl is in Ukraine, anon

>>213834768 (OP)
polebros nooo

yeah we fuck

>>213835255
you think you run the country when this generation is several times smaller and poorer, funny

>>213835842
But you don't need many plants. And you can combine them with hydro.
> Like, it's very difficult to agree that nuclear energy is safe when the argument comes from a nation that casually poisoned half of Europe and then pretended that nothing happened.
What if my flag was Japanese?

>>213835879
Yes but Soviet Union was a heavily centralized state where decisions were taken in Moscow, so I blame Russians for why:
1. They decided to build a shitty reactor.
2. They decided to run YOLO experiments.
3. They decided to play dumb when inquired about the disaster.

Sure, the reactor itself was in Ukraine, but all the relevant decisions were taken in Moscow.

>>213836281
>tsaaaar the ruskies made Mykola blow up the plant or however the pig oinks

>>213836272
I admit that I have a bias against Russians because hating Russians is not only pleasure, it's also obligation. Sorry, but I am a flawed human, and sometimes emotions get in line of logic.

Seriously though, I think that Japan is actually a better argument against nuclear energy than Russia. Let me use Russia/Soviet Union interchangeably - the Chernobyl disaster happened in a country where systematic corruption was the everyday norm, which is more of a proof that Russia fucked up, while Fukushima disaster happened in Japan, which is a country that is much more "in the clear". Fukushima proved that nuclear energy can blow up even in a highly developed and functional country, therefore nuclear energy itself is NOT safe.

Having said the above, one crucial difference is that the Japanese immediately told everyone "wow shit got fucked, everyone pay attention" while Russians simply denied denied denied.

>>213834768 (OP)
I think it's 0.8 here right now, not 1.0

>>213836511
Russia didn’t even exist in 1986

>>213836535
Neither did you, so shut the fuck up.

>>213836556
If you did, how was your prostate exam. Did you like it.

>>213836511
> Having said the above, one crucial difference is that the Japanese immediately told everyone "wow shit got fucked, everyone pay attention" while Russians simply denied denied denied.
Except they denied the scale of the disaster.
> the Chernobyl disaster happened in a country where systematic corruption was the everyday norm
You sure you're talking about USSR and not nowadays Russia?

>>213836640
>Except they denied the scale of the disaster.
Even if, it's still better than to deny the disaster taking place at all. Let's not get dragged into this silly discussion "but they're evil too".

>You sure you're talking about USSR and not nowadays Russia?
I have to admit that my knowledge here might be imperfect, but my parents, having lived in one of communist satellite countries, claim that widespread corruption was not only rampant, it was normal.

If there's something you'd like to me to read/watch, feel free to link. I have some free time actually. Don't make it too long though.

>>213834791
we just don't have enough 3rd world immigrants
im pretty sure birth rate for white ethnic Germans is as low or lower than ours

>>213836853
> Even if, it's still better than to deny the disaster taking place at all. Let's not get dragged into this silly discussion "but they're evil too".
No it's not. Nuclear fallout in Germany didn't care when the Soviets finally admitted Chernobyl happened but tried to hide the real scale.
I have to admit that my knowledge here might be imperfect, but my parents, having lived in one of communist satellite countries, claim that widespread corruption was not only rampant, it was normal.

> If there's something you'd like to me to read/watch, feel free to link. I have some free time actually. Don't make it too long though.
What i meant to say is that you're describing nowadays Russia. On top of that, there was an entire decade of pretty much lawlessness and chaos in the 1900s. In 30 years - no major incidents, in fact Rosatom was doing some cleanups here and there.

>>213836512
Stay strong bro, when the war is over you will have a baby boom and become super rich and powerful like the USA did after WW2.

>>213837094
>On top of that, there was an entire decade of pretty much lawlessness and chaos in the 1900s.
I guess you meant 1990s lol.

I think our difference in perception is that after the Soviet Union collapsed, Russia became extremely chaotic, and nowadays we have Putin casually having decided to start a war for shits and giggles, so it seems like the soviet system wasn't that bad because it mostly functioned (if we forget about the whole Chernobyl thing), and least compared to what came afterwards.

Meanwhile my country has immeasurably improved after communists left, so it's really hard to describe communist times with anything other than "corrupt shithole".

>>213837240
see pic rel

>>213837336
> it seems like the soviet system wasn't that bad because it mostly functioned
Nothing changed since then. It's still mostly fucnctioning, still the important decisions being made by a very limited amount of people while the rest is removed from politics. The only difference is that now, or rather, befroe teh war, people in charge were able to syphon their wealth abroad.
BTW you can thank the West and American leadership specifically for that, they were the advisors that helped to build the system, and later with the IMF to keep it from crambling in 1996 by helping Eltsyn stay in power for one more term.

>>213837240
They won't. As much as i want Ukraine to succeed, if only to spite our leadership and headless Putin supporters, there's virtually no chance.