>>213851795 He could send the whole population of his duchy and it'd still change basically nothing. There were less than 9k Liechtensteiners when the US bought Alaska.
>>213851795 They have no port and not enough people though And other bloodthirsty colonial powers like Spain or Britain would probably seize it anyways
>>213851945 It doesn't really matter if they didn't have a port. IRL isn't EU4 lmao. They could just use another country's port. Liechenstein is just a micro Switzerland, they probably had good relations with all their neighbours like they do today.
Anonymous
8/15/2025, 10:31:46 PM No.213852034
>>213851915 The deal was something like 27 million in current US dollars.
>>213851921 Who cares about the natives? Liechtenstein, with immense improbable luck, could keep it maaaaybe until WW1. Then the UK would seize it since Liechtenstein just did whatever Austria did back then. Alternatively they could go against Austria and get instantly occupied at home.
>>213852034 Google says it would be 153.5 million in current USD Which is still fucking nuts. Owning the huge swathe of land in perpetuity, with all the associated territorial waters, resources etc etc. For comparison that's less than a third of daily NHS spending in the UK.
>>213852103 Yeah, but let's be honest the UK very well could've asked for them to take a side just so they can map paint the one bit of the farthest north north america they were missing
>>213851860 i know this must sound like complete ailien speech to your bloodythirsty tiny polish frontal lobe. but lichtensteiners are great at making friends unlike poolacks who just hold a grudge against the entire world
Anonymous
8/16/2025, 12:25:46 AM No.213855371
>>213852103 UK seized lots of neutral countries during the world wars