>no he didn't do it >okay maybe he did do it but we have no way of knowing >yes he may have done it but he was undercover
(we are here) >okay he wasn't undercover but given what's he's done for the nation at large he can be forgiven for a one time lapse in judgment >yes he may have done it multiple times across decades but he's done with that and will punish the truly guilty >he isn't punishing anyone because that will destabilize the global economy far too much but at least he's not pro-paedophilia
>>214675719
Unlikely. Anything real would be suppressed to the utmost extent. Even though there may be some of that shit in existence, at this point AI seems more plausible.
>>214676019
You must have a very low opinion of the goyim to think we can't see through your obvious attempts to derail a thread about israel-backed pedophiles. Fucking kys.