>>215918397
>I think drone pilots should be made to pay this, even if it means they're in debt for the rest of their lives.
>Same goes for climate activists who superglue themselves to the runways.
Drone pilots that disrupt airports are either secret service operatives themselves (foreign or and domestic) or intermediaries that will be compensated for whatever reason.
Same for climate activists: if you pay attention, almost all of them are paid by some talent agency (with horizontal connections added), or rich kids, or intermediaries (again) of secret services.
Average civilians with no connection to anything don't do this, but you knew this already...
Also, just to debunk the argument further: once secret service foreign/domestic operatives are the cause of it (for the sake of the argument), it doesn't make sense to bill them.
Stuff like this isn't done between spooks, because spooks don't really have a problem with each other. When's the last time you heard intelligence officers liquidating foreign intelligence officers? Never. Just in movies.