>>216351238
Correct. In the list, only two can be called tajiks, those are Kulob/Hisor, all the others labeled as tajiks are in fact pamiris and other small indigenous peoples of the region like yagnobis whom the persochinks genociding rn.
>>216351238 >You'll probably get something sikilar by mixing some sort of udmurt, a ukrainian and a tajik from those parts.
Pure Slavs like Ukrainians have too little pure EHG to model the northern component of early Indo-Europeans, Sarmatians were 70% Yamniggers despite the presence of BMAC and Siberians, ANE and some other exotic components.
>>216351332
I was thinking ukrainians-cossacks cause they might have higher CHG while retaining high EHG but it was just a guess based on the region desu
Also weren't Sarmatian descended from sintashta? They should be less than 70% since sintashta were like 60% themselves >>216351318 >whom the persochinks genociding rn.
Huh? Why? How? That's a shame
>>216351816 >Also weren't Sarmatian descended from sintashta? They should be less than 70% since sintashta were like 60% themselves
The Sarmatians are apparently descendants of the Srubnaya culture, and the Srubnaya culture is a mixture of Sintashta and Yamnaya elements. Consequently, they actually had a higher WSH ansestry than the Sintashta themselves.