Thread 216528690

Why shouldn't the State simply own all housing and provide it as a utility to the community.
What is functionally gained by having a landlord class act as middle-men.

Houses are for living in, not for speculation

Competition.

That's a guy tho

Is she looking for stasi mics?

>>216528690 (OP)
is that a ballsack or a vagina?
why am I even asking?
I fucking hate this website anyway

>>216528690 (OP)
You could just kill jews instead of thinking of novel new ways of reinventing the wheel

>>216528731
even better

>>216528690 (OP)
Eww
>>216529010
tsmt

>>216528690 (OP)
It would be a herculean task and actually dystopian. Much better to strictly regulate the housing sector and let individuals manage the land (ideally democratically). I'm all for communism but you have to practice *diamat* here and now in 2025, it's more complex than what the communists usually suggest.

>>216528690 (OP)
I want to dress like this

>>216528690 (OP)
>Lets get more power to the state
Wonderful idea

>>216528690 (OP)
Our state don't own the housing but they do control it.
Landlords (like 90% of all apartments in Sweden are owned by giant housing companies) and they are forced to follow the housing laws, rent caps and tenant rights.
Basically no freedom to raise rents randomly, any actual raise is done within set parameters and as a tenant you pretty much hold all the rights as long as you do not break the rules multiple times.
Contracts are not time limited, rents are set (no highest bidder bullshit) and once you rent a place you can stay there until you die if you want.

Downside is our housing queue system (based on points per day) and in some areas like central Stockholm it can be a decade long in worst case scenarios.
We still have private landlords but that's the desperate option because they will charge insane rents for even the smallest place.

>>216528690 (OP)
cavernous bumhole

>>216529243
post a selfie