>>216627996 (OP)
Get it on notepad or paper.
When you have a question, assume you don't have the answer.
Lay out how you can answer the question or a series of sub-questions you can ask (which you also don't have the answer to).
Find answers and compare them, then form more questions about the veracity of the information, the writers' intentions, or the perspectives involved. (Nab source URLs and quotes, as though you were writing an essay.)
Write all of this down and organize them in folders and word documents so you can return these questions later.
Put the information you have together into a coherent narrative and talk to people interested in the same topic.
Get your shit pushed in because you don't actually know what you're talking about.
Ask questions about the answers and see how well the responses you got hold up in the face of the information you have, as well as information you later acquire.
Mark it down in a word document.
Eventually, download Zotero and Obsidian to commit to a full lifestyle of analyzing shitposts and books.
You only might become an intellectual. If you're like me, you'll become an information hoarder who has no use for the things he nabs.
If you want to skip to the end of this life path, the best form of intelligence is functional intelligence. Someone who can talk his way into a high-paying position is applying his intelligence in a way that benefits him, but men like me, whose intelligence is only good for contextualizing centuries-old narratives and overthinking kids' shows can call ourselves "intellectual" as a cope.
Still, there's some satisfaction in having the answers to the question that matter to you, and an ability to discuss these with people you respect. It'll ground you as a person, so good on you for seeking this out.