Would chemical weapons be able to break the stalemate on the eastern front?

>>63814818 (OP)
Imagine being the "world number 1 army" and getting into a stalemate with one of Europes poorest nations

>>63814818 (OP)
they could. if used properly. however russia doesn't train CBRN anymore, so if they dump chemical weapons somewhere, they're going to just march in, five minutes before realizing that the local depots sold off all the gas masks because eternally
>picrel

>>63814833
>jews giving ukraine 350 billion dollars in 3 years
gee i wonder why russia is having a tough time

>>63814865
>Wed get another attack of the dead men on drone recording
Imagine

>>63814900
>Russia was supposed to go toe to toe with NATO
>can't even beat a country receiving less than it's defense budget annually
Not making yourself look any better.

>>63814818 (OP)
yeah, it could possibly end this war in a few days, if deployed en masse. Nerve agent can be frighteningly effective
Unironically, germans back then could have ground the soviet's offensive to a full stop by deploying tabun en masse.

>>63814900
>jews
Back to pol nigger

>>63814900
>#1 military in the world
>Can't deal with one of the poorest countries in the world
>Because the Jews give send it a bunch of 50 year old scrap, equal in value to about 1/8th of the real #1 military's annual budget

>>63814900
>jews
Fun fact. Putin's mother was Jewish, which makes Putin Jewish by blood and thus of a higher value 'Jew' in the eyes of Jews than Zelensky, who's father was a Jew. This is due to Jewish matrilineal law which could prove the religion of the mother but not the father. Another fun fact, Israel told Ukraine to surrender to Russia. Curious. Israel has sent no aid to Ukraine, not even medical. Curious. The second most common nationality after Israeli in Israel is Russian. Curious. Putin's daughter married a Jew. Curious. Putin has Zionism awards. Curious.

But that's me just noticing things again, I should stop doing that.

>>63814818 (OP)
There have already been a few cases of russia using chemical weapons in the war. Most if not all were tear gas, not that geneva cares, and had limited effect on the war itself. It might have been a big factor on the tactical level though.

>>63814818 (OP)
It would win a battle or two before international backlash lost you the war.
If the Ukies did it they would lose all aim.
If the Russians did it the would face a drastic increase in Ukie aid and risk some of the EU entering the war.

>>63814994
You really should stop n00ticing things.

Like the fact that Israel is a money-laundering destination for a lot of Russians who aren't rich enough to afford the Caymans or the Seychelles.
Or the fact that Jewish mafia and Russian mafia are pretty much the same thing nowadays.

>>63814994
>>63815064
Not all jews are zionists.

>>63814818 (OP)
Chemical weapons were a sort of MAD weapon even in WW2, and are arguably the prototype for the nuclear MAD and eventual de-escalation.
The military utility is far too low compared to the risks and political fallout. A couple of soldiers die before gas masks are issued to everyone and the aggressor alienates a few more supporters.

>>63815070
>No they are GOOD Jews
How far /pol/ has fallen.

>>63814900
Russia is getting military assistance from Iran, China and North Korea, as well as actively recruiting African mercenaries. That does not mean Ukraine is fighting those countries.
Just as the fact that Ukraine gets military assistance from the West does not mean that Russia is fighting Nato.

>>63815082
Hey buddy I think you got the wrong door, /pol/ is two boards down

Why did his wife ack herself?

>>63815203
Nerve gas

We will undoubtedly see much use of chemical weapons before Russia is ultimately subdued as a nation. Scorched earth out the arse.

>>63815188
>ivan
Who the fuck do you think I am bitch?

>>63814934
not with the morale of the current russian soldiers. they're there for money, not honor or duty. they'd get smell a funny gas, see Yuri retch, and then shoot themselves.

>>63815421
You can skip a few steps there
They shoot themselves a lot

>>63815414
My bad, you're a pajeet. Good morning saar.

>>63815434
>everyone I dont like is a kike, oinker, zigger or paki

>>63815410
Technically we already have, what with all the drone-dropped CS (IIRC) grenades the Russians have been using for the past few years.

>>63815437
So which one are you?

>>63815644
>>63815437
I’ll take your lack of response as an affirmation of your heightened melanin

>>63814818 (OP)
certainly not, they couldn't even break the stalemate in WW1 and since then measures against gas attacks have improved greatly

>>63814900
>russia can't even compete with 350 billion over 3 years

>>63815070
Okay and what about the connections with Isreal and the awards from zionist groups?

>>63814818 (OP)
>inb4 Russia gasses itself

>>63814818 (OP)
did chemical weapons break the stalemate on the western front?

>>63814973
Honest question from an histoylet: if nazis heavily invested and used chemical weapons in, say, 1941, could this have changed the outcome of the war? It is not that at that point they still had anyone not pissed off at them.
While I am at it: could have Italy sabotaged Suez and taken Malta and Gibraltar in the very first days after the declaration of war?

>>63816646
>im retarded and dont understand attritional warfare and how thats been russias strategy for 500 years

>>63814818 (OP)
No. It might have gotten them surprise and some kind of limited gains depending on how it was used, but NO weapon is a "war-winning" weapon on its own, because people will always develop countermeasures.

In this case, the Western Allies already had both protective gear and their own chemical weapons ready to go if it was used. (see Bari port bombing in Italy, 1944)

The Soviet might have taken some serious casualties, but they always do anyway, then they'd either issue their own masks/etc and shoot their own wargas, or the Western Allies would supply them with via Lend Lease.

Gas would just make everything more miserable than it already was.

>>63818613
>but NO weapon is a "war-winning" weapon on its own, because people will always develop countermeasures.
Tell that to nuclear weapons.
Sarin and Tabun were more potent than any gas the United Nations had.

>>63816978
>attritional warfare
Russia is losing this attritional war lol.
Russia doing “attritional warfare” is a cope for them being so incompetent and inefficient in ww2 that they needed the US to do half their supplying and manufacturing for them otherwise they’d get rekt.

>>63816755
No? And it's not like they weren't already producing tabun and sarin.
Even if hitler wouldn't have opposed the use it still wouldn't have made a difference.

>>63814900
>jews
kys retarded polturd

>>63818632
You are absolutly retarded, the countermeasure to nuclear weapons is other people having them too and the reaction they'll have to you throwing them around.

>>63819092
You can't simply develop nuclear weapons out of nowhere.
If the Manhattan Project had reached fruition in 1943 or 1944 it wouldn't have given the Axis the opportunity to develop nukes of their own. It took the Soviets until 1949 to successfully test their own devices and they had plenty of spies in the Manhattan Project.

>>63815070
But they are evil