← Home ← Back to /k/

Thread 63818753

41 posts 18 images /k/
Anonymous No.63818753 [Report] >>63818763 >>63819538 >>63819638 >>63819729 >>63819858 >>63820374 >>63820417 >>63820426 >>63820569 >>63822114 >>63822133
Your main bitch is my side piece
Cope and seethe, but this is what peak performance looks like. Also before you armchair experts say anything the ACOG is directly in line with the barrel bore so even a retard could use the bdc.
Anonymous No.63818758 [Report]
fuck ya
mudda
Anonymous No.63818763 [Report]
>>63818753 (OP)
Stop being a poor fag and get a left side canned ACOG for when you switch shoulders.
Anonymous No.63819538 [Report] >>63819725 >>63820853 >>63821021
>>63818753 (OP)
You posted this yesterday and I’ll say the same thing today as I did then; just learn to shoot with both eyes open and you won’t have any problems with shooting under 50 yards using an acog.
Anonymous No.63819638 [Report] >>63819725
>>63818753 (OP)
it's just retarded. the acog is better than the red dot out past 100 yards, maybe even past 50 yards and now you are compromising your firing position to use it
Anonymous No.63819725 [Report] >>63819745 >>63819821 >>63819848 >>63819860 >>63819863 >>63820002 >>63821489
>>63819538
>>63819638
I want an acog but there are 50 versions of each scope to pick from and the asymmetrical tube on top is kind of ugly desu
Anonymous No.63819729 [Report] >>63819822 >>63820282 >>63820861 >>63822114
>>63818753 (OP)
>ITT: people who lack the brain cells to understand as to why this is actually a good idea and not just rage bait

This is better than a red dot/magnifier. It’s simply min/max’d opposite of ACOG w offset RMR. Think about it, if you’re in an environment that warrants a red dot/magnifier, most of your engagements will most likely be under 50 yards.


With this set up you can keep the stock in traditional up-and-down shoulder pocket position for best recoil control, even when moving. This is vital for engaging up close, dynamic threats. As opposed to the reversed, typical set up: ACOG w offset RMR. With that set up, engaging up close and fast targets with the red dot will be done with the stock in a diagonal shoulder position, AKA not as stable for recoil management on the move.


For the small number of targets you may engage over 50 yards, simply tilt your rifle and you have the best prism scope with its own reticle. Better glass than any magnifier, plus 1x more magnification than most common magnifier set ups. No having to remove your hands to gain that magnification. And you’re not lining up 4 different lenses since it’s its own dedicated scope. It also weighs about the same as a magnifier. Between a magnifier and an ACOG, which would you rather be engaging a 75 yard target obscured by cover with?

It just looks stupid.
Anonymous No.63819745 [Report]
>>63819725
just get the one that matches your barrel length and spin rate
Anonymous No.63819821 [Report]
>>63819725
as the other anon said there are so many variations so that you can pick one for your barrel length, twist rate, and preferred ammo. I use the ta31 because my rifle has a >18 inch barrel and I mostly shoot m193.

If you want the simplest and most common acog, just get one of those. You could also get the battery powered version but I personally love the asymmetry. Too much symmetry is boring and it's a neat design cue to me. Definitely iconic.
Anonymous No.63819822 [Report] >>63819891
>>63819729
reddit spacing lol
Anonymous No.63819848 [Report]
>>63819725
4x is best ran all the way back with no buis. 3.5x is alot more forgiving. I wouldnt try to find one that matches your exact load and barrel length, it will be close enough and you should learn your reticle anyways.
Anonymous No.63819858 [Report] >>63819878
>>63818753 (OP)
Flip up magnifiers exist because zero doesn't matter, the optic never moves.
Replacing the magnifier with an optic and expecting it to retain zero is an interesting concept, do you actually shoot it far enough to know if it works?
Anonymous No.63819860 [Report]
>>63819725
TA01NSN
TA02 if you want to piggyback a dot
Anonymous No.63819863 [Report]
>>63819725
Just get a ta31
Anonymous No.63819878 [Report] >>63819904
>>63819858
You're misunderstanding what OP is doing. Hes not using the acog as a magnifier, hes using it as a canted optic. Usually people run 1x red dots offset/canted while running their magnified optic on the rail. OP is doing the opposite. Also, the point youre trying to make only makes sense if you switch your focus to the prism reticle if using the acog as a magnifier instead of staying focused on the dot. When set up behind a 1x dot, acogs most definitely act as a magnifier. In fact theyre the reason we even have magnifiers today in the form that they're in. Picrel
Anonymous No.63819891 [Report] >>63819980
>>63819822
Literally, he even double spaced.
Anonymous No.63819904 [Report] >>63820282 >>63820463
>>63819878
Thanks anon, I didn't see it was a canted mount.
As for using the ACOG as a mag sure it works but why spend ACOG money for magnified red dot ranges.
The guy in your pic gets everything for free.
Anonymous No.63819980 [Report]
>>63819891
go back
Anonymous No.63820002 [Report] >>63820015
>>63819725
>asymmetrical tube on top is kind of ugly desu

Degenerate autist mannerisms. Just embrace asymmetry. An AR15 has an ejection port on one side. Does that make it unusable to you?
Anonymous No.63820015 [Report]
>>63820002
Yes, so far the only guns I can tolerate are the VHS-2 and the P90
Anonymous No.63820033 [Report] >>63821061
What are the diagonal lines for?
Anonymous No.63820282 [Report]
>>63819729
>Between a magnifier and an ACOG, which would you rather be engaging a 75 yard target obscured by cover with?
you're absolutely retarded and don't shoot with enough frequency to have an opinion worth listening to
if you shoot with both eyes open an ACOG on a 5.56 is 100% usable anywhere between 15-500 yards, and even shorter if you know your holdover on the zero at short range. if you shift focus to your non-dominant eye, the ACOG effectively becomes a red dot.
your entire post is "I don't know what bindon aiming is"

>>63819904
>why spend ACOG money for magnified red dot ranges
tritium died and you don't have time to fill out paperwork and send it back to trijicon
Anonymous No.63820374 [Report]
>>63818753 (OP)
>ACOG is directly in line with the barrel bore so even a retard could use the bdc.
the only thing that matters is that the sight was oriented upright during zeroing and the same orientation/position. a few inches of offset in any direction is negligible. You could mount it upsidedown and six inches to the side and it will hit true if you rotate the whole thing so the sight is upright and do a PI shift for your offset.
Anonymous No.63820417 [Report]
>>63818753 (OP)
That setup will be a passing fad.
Anonymous No.63820426 [Report]
>>63818753 (OP)
it appears that you came here looking for a debate
Anonymous No.63820463 [Report]
>>63819904
>but why spend ACOG money for magnified red dot ranges.
You shouldn't be using an acog as a magnifier unless its for clone autism, but you should be using an acog instead of dot+mag
Anonymous No.63820569 [Report] >>63820816 >>63821098
>>63818753 (OP)
memepoints and trijicucks are so 2012
adapt or die boomer
Anonymous No.63820816 [Report]
>>63820569
I'll adapt to banging your mom.
Anonymous No.63820853 [Report] >>63820885
>>63819538
Why do you need to shoot with both eyes open to hit under 50yds with an ACOG?
For parallax?
I can see some idea of genius, but it should only be a matter of where you hold your reticle.
Anonymous No.63820861 [Report]
>>63819729
You are masturbating to the smell of your own farts.
Anonymous No.63820885 [Report] >>63821493
>>63820853
>Why do you need to shoot with both eyes open to hit under 50yds with an ACOG
You dont need to, it just makes target acquisition faster because of the fov. He's saying you can basically treat it like a red dot which is true. Here's a shitty out of focus picture that will give you an idea of what he's talking about. In real life you would be further back on the stock meaning you'd have less of the optic in view as well, it wont be as cramped as it looks in picrel.
Anonymous No.63821021 [Report]
>>63819538
Why would you put an acog on an x95? I have one and that's not a weapon for use past ...50-100 yards. Gross, take that off and throw a red dot on
Anonymous No.63821061 [Report] >>63821359
>>63820033
That is conventional symbol that represents they these long lines go much further than in the diagram. These diagonal lines represent middle of these lines cut if from diagrams so it can fit in . This scale. Three isn no diagonal lines in the optic image.
Anonymous No.63821098 [Report]
>>63820569
yea bro lpvos are so epic
Anonymous No.63821359 [Report] >>63822122
>>63821061
they're the same size???
Anonymous No.63821489 [Report]
>>63819725
>asymmetrical
try an ELCAN instead then
Anonymous No.63821493 [Report]
>>63820885
Oh yeah that checks out completely.
Thanks anon.
Anonymous No.63822114 [Report]
>>63818753 (OP)
>>63819729
why do you need magnification anyways? a policeman killed a guy 180 yards away with one shot using just a red dot
you CAN shoot that well, right anon?
Anonymous No.63822122 [Report]
>>63821359
its just an engineeringism
i've seen that sort of thing on a diagram but what was shown on the diagram was actually much larger than the actual thing, which was pretty funny
Anonymous No.63822132 [Report]
>niggerspeak in OP
Sage
Anonymous No.63822133 [Report]
>>63818753 (OP)
>Implying I can even afford an ACOG optic.