Anonymous
6/13/2025, 7:45:38 AM No.63823766![st,small,845x845-bg,f8f8f8[1]](/images/k/1749793538320495.jpg)
Is russian anti air a meme? They couldnt stop hohols from pounding them into dust with f16s, now schlomos turned iran into a shooting range without a single loss
Replies:
Thread 63823766 - /k/ [Archived: 1130 hours ago]
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 7:53:48 AM No.63823786
As far as I can tell hundred series SAMs are a serious threat at altitude and they will force you low but the low altitude Russia SAMs are either trash or not being deployed in significant numbers around the hundred series.
Israel / Iran is bitter sweet, it's nice seeing Russian kit get fucked but I can't support Israel.
Israel / Iran is bitter sweet, it's nice seeing Russian kit get fucked but I can't support Israel.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 9:34:06 AM No.63824095
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 10:17:17 AM No.63824217
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 10:29:17 AM No.63824262
>>63823786
Yeah, at least the older ones were probably made to shoot down high-flying Cold War era bombers & fighter escorts, and have some capability against ballistic missiles (e.g. the Scud), but I don't think they're too effective against anything more subtle than that.
Hell, some of the older missile variants have barely any homing ability by modern standards, relying on command guidance or semi-active radar homing, which will fail badly if the radar's struggling to even track the target. A modern missile like this typically couples all sorts of seeking techniques, and might pack an AESA radar + multispectral optics along with a data link to command guide it closer to the target if the missile can't immediately lock on at launch. Compared to that, this old Soviet shit's like shooting blindly into the darkness (which probably isn't helped by how bad these turdies tend to be at organizing and communicating).
Yeah, at least the older ones were probably made to shoot down high-flying Cold War era bombers & fighter escorts, and have some capability against ballistic missiles (e.g. the Scud), but I don't think they're too effective against anything more subtle than that.
Hell, some of the older missile variants have barely any homing ability by modern standards, relying on command guidance or semi-active radar homing, which will fail badly if the radar's struggling to even track the target. A modern missile like this typically couples all sorts of seeking techniques, and might pack an AESA radar + multispectral optics along with a data link to command guide it closer to the target if the missile can't immediately lock on at launch. Compared to that, this old Soviet shit's like shooting blindly into the darkness (which probably isn't helped by how bad these turdies tend to be at organizing and communicating).
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 11:38:19 AM No.63824471
>>63823786
I support iranistan getting fukt back into th estone age. Don't really care who does it, other than if the orange heinous had any balls he could eliminate their entire military with daily shitfucking for the next few years. If only he had an balls. Fucking coward, can only punch down on the most helpless.
I support iranistan getting fukt back into th estone age. Don't really care who does it, other than if the orange heinous had any balls he could eliminate their entire military with daily shitfucking for the next few years. If only he had an balls. Fucking coward, can only punch down on the most helpless.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 12:03:31 PM No.63824520
>>63824471
Yes goy, spending US tax dollars decimating 1sr*el's only regional enemy is a good thing.
Yes goy, spending US tax dollars decimating 1sr*el's only regional enemy is a good thing.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 12:13:07 PM No.63824529
>>63823786
>can't support Israel
same, but damn if they aren't being incredibly useful (and entertaining)
>can't support Israel
same, but damn if they aren't being incredibly useful (and entertaining)
Replies:
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 12:18:42 PM No.63824536
>>63824520
So you are saying Turkey, Saudis and Egypt are even more pathetic then Iran? Really?
>>63824529
This.
So you are saying Turkey, Saudis and Egypt are even more pathetic then Iran? Really?
>>63824529
This.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 1:07:28 PM No.63824667
>>63824536
In what world are any of those going to target Israel? Egypt is paid off with US foreign aid, abraham acords for sauidis, and Turks did literally nothing but a couple empty threats after post Oct 7 first israli occupation of gaza but zero follow through. Have you just not been paying attention or are you just running hasbara shlomo?
In what world are any of those going to target Israel? Egypt is paid off with US foreign aid, abraham acords for sauidis, and Turks did literally nothing but a couple empty threats after post Oct 7 first israli occupation of gaza but zero follow through. Have you just not been paying attention or are you just running hasbara shlomo?
Replies:
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 1:26:33 PM No.63824710
>>63824667
Saudis do whatever suits them. They will break accords as soon as it becomes profitable. Not my problem Erdocuck is such coward. Turkey could easily be Israel's rival. And it might be as soon as this particular leader disappears.
>>63824667
>hasbara shlomo
Sorry I don't spend my days at /pol/ so I have no idea why kind of insult that was supposed to be.
Saudis do whatever suits them. They will break accords as soon as it becomes profitable. Not my problem Erdocuck is such coward. Turkey could easily be Israel's rival. And it might be as soon as this particular leader disappears.
>>63824667
>hasbara shlomo
Sorry I don't spend my days at /pol/ so I have no idea why kind of insult that was supposed to be.
