Would a nuclear shaped charge, particularly one scaled down to a tactical nuke or even an artillery shell, have any practical applications on the ground?

>>63824453 (OP)
No. It would be stopped by atmosphere.

>>63824453 (OP)
Surface-to-Orbit cannons

>>63824453 (OP)
Why is tungsten the propellant? Shouldn't it be the projectile?

>>63824792
>what's plasma?
>how does fysics wurk?

>>63824792
Densitymaxxing.

>Shouldn't it be the projectile?
It's totally vaporized by explosion and turned into plasma. "Projectile" is cloud of plasma, similar to smoke rings, stablised by electromagnetic forces (it's charged plasma after all) that files as compact form.

>>63824453 (OP)
Play Terra Invictus so see them get used in combat.

>>63824453 (OP)
Possibly as a super bunker-buster bomb, but I'm not sure how well such a device would penetrate the ground.

>>63825103
Inside atmosphere it would make zero difference with conventional nuclear device.

>>63824453 (OP)
>Escalation past the nuclear threshold
>For a single EFP
ISHYGDDT

>>63825478
Conventional nukes are actually not very efficient for penetrating armor materials. All those giant craters are from nukes buried in dirt.