Why do muzzrats keep lying in warfare?

>>63833043 (OP)
To the surprise of nobody.

>>63833043 (OP)
>Why do muzzrats keep lying in warfare?
The real question is why didn't India correct it immediately? It would've saved a lot of face.
Mayhaps to negociate a better deal on the Rafale contracts?

>>63833043 (OP)
Muzzrats are master copers.

Look jeet, just because Iran is lying about downed F-35s doesn't mean you street shitters didn't lose those birds. It's 100% confirmed at this point.

Getting sick, physically sick of these crusty curry induced diarrhea posts.

>>63833043 (OP)
Their entire societies are about pretense. All of it.

>>63833113
>The real question is why didn't India correct it immediately?
Because they were in a rapidly escalating situation and it might be helpful to the Indians if Pakistan is spending time and effort confirming the shoot-downs or operating as if they had happened.

Post the French media link directly instead of TheLegateIN

>>63833043 (OP)
russian influence probably

>>63833043 (OP)
>>63833740
>>63833118
>the CEO of dassault said so, it must be true

>>63833621

>>63833769
it's called reputation, my brown friend
when a russia, arab or other subhuman says X it's 99% lies, hence even if they say that the sky is blue you should go and check

>>63833621
https://www.challenges.fr/entreprise/defense/le-rafale-est-meilleur-que-le-f-35-et-que-tous-les-avions-chinois-les-verites-du-patron-de-dassault_605879

>The loss of at least one Rafale by India during the air confrontation with Pakistan in early May has raised questions in the defense community. Has the Rafale reached its limits?
>Éric Trappier - The Indians haven't communicated, so we don't know exactly what happened. What we do know is that what the Pakistanis say [three Rafales destroyed, editor's note] is inaccurate. On the other hand, when you operate combat aircraft, you're carrying out a mission. Mission success isn't about having zero losses, it's about achieving your objectives. In the Second World War, it wasn't said that the Allies lost the war because they lost troops... We'll see whether there were casualties or not, and whether the war aims were achieved. When the truth comes out, some people may be in for a surprise.

So not exactly what the tweet is saying...
Now obviously Trappier won't say anything if the indians won't.

Full text for those interested
https://www.textise.net/showText.aspx?strURL=https%253A//www.challenges.fr/entreprise/defense/le-rafale-est-meilleur-que-le-f-35-et-que-tous-les-avions-chinois-les-verites-du-patron-de-dassault_605879

>>63833043 (OP)
>india denies acces to dassault inspectirs
Dassault determines that only 1 rafalel was lost and possibly to bad weather :^)

>>63833797
>>63833914
I can read French and the indian article is bullshitting again.
French CEO said losses during a mission can be expected and the indians did not communicate, so all they know is the numbers are not exact, which is not outright dismissing the Paki claims.

>>63833113
India probably wasn't sure where their own planes were.

>>63833120
Where is the 100% confirmation? Or even the 3.5% confirmation?
I don't give a crap about France, India or Pakistan but you halfwit mongrels keep talking about confirmation like the uncle that molested them's twitter post is an actual source.

At this point Everyone would agree that China has better electronics and avionics than french surrender monkeys

>>63835068
Add in logistics system and work ethic. I hate the chinks but the fucking french are willfully pathetic.

>>63835042
saar...

>>63833254
>Larry, marketing is telling us you need a catchphrase
>how bout and that's the way it is...
>meh

>>63833043 (OP)
>yes goy you have to trust a CEO statement made before Q2 earnings call

>>63833043 (OP)
It was four.

>>63833043 (OP)

>>63834029
So can I and you're incorrect. He says
>Les Indiens n’ont pas communiqué, donc nous ne savons pas exactement ce qu’il s’est passé. Ce qu’on sait déjà, c’est que ce que les dires des Pakistanais [trois Rafale détruits, ndlr] sont inexactes
In the original interview which is
>The Indians haven't communicated, so we don't know exactly what happened. What we already know is that what the Pakistanis are saying [three Rafales destroyed, editor's note ] is inaccurate
So he is saying that the information about more than one downed is inaccurate. He then goes on to mention WW2 and how losses happened but you can't say that the Allies lost because of troop losses. He then says it is better than the F-35 in multirole and much better than Chinese aircraft and only the F-22 in terms of fighter role is better.

>>63835973
And this is the Japanese goalkeeper for their national team, what's your point?

>>63836034
>Pakistanis are saying [three Rafales destroyed, editor's note ] is inaccurate
That's all he could conclude. It could be 0, 1, 2, 4, 500 or 2000 since indians weren't eager to disclose anything. He did not dismiss outright that Rafales were destroyed and he could not admit any number neither, just said that losing aircrafts is acceptable for successful missions.

>>63836045
its a funny webm

>>63833043 (OP)
>not 3 sarrr
>we only lost 1 jet and it's due to our own fault
do jeet really?

What could the indians be hiding?

>>63838087
indian tier storage, maintenance, logistics, training, etc. you know, the usual.

>>63838087
>What could the indians be hiding?
The fact that they're a bunch of shit-covered retards who would likely lose F-35s to SPAAGs, if they had them.

>>63838087
>What could the indians be hiding?
Poop everywhere.
You name it, there's poop there.

>>63838087
Their own incompetence, obviously

>>63838108
>You name it, there's poop there.
Toilet

ngl Dassault getting uppity and publicly demanding that poos provide them information in a conflict that was ongoing at that point was prime bullshit
like who the fuck do they think they are

>>63833113
because no one's going to believe jeets either

>>63838108
if only they were hiding it

>>63836164
More like frogs refusing to admit their plane is shit that got beaten by chinesium rockets and shifting the blame to jeets that 100% didn't maintain the planes as they should have (hence why the refused to let Dassault check on them). Pakis are 100% overclaiming for sure, so it is all a net of fetid lies and human excrement.

Human excrement made the planes.
Human excrement made the rockets that shoot them down.
Human excrement manned the SAM batteries.
Human excrement piloted them.
Human excrement was on the controls and intakes.

It's shit all the way down the designated shitting street.

>>63838131
no, that is filled with flowers and incense, they turned it into a shrine for prayers.

>>63838133
>ngl Dassault getting uppity and publicly demanding that poos provide them information in a conflict that was ongoing at that point was prime bullshit
like who the fuck do they think they are
That's just standard procedure, you fucktard. Of course the manufacturer has to know as soon as possible what happened. Much like for any aircraft crash, see the Indian one (again) that made 200 victims the other day. Boeing has to know as soon as possible if there's any hazard to ensure safety for the other manufactured aircraft in active use. This is how you continuously improve reliability. Same for any fighter jet, ESPECIALLY during an ongoing conflict where they are in use. Any potential point of failure, whatever it may be, from the plane itself to the way it was used, must be know and fixed as soon as possible.
You're fucking retarded beyond what words can describe. Only a thirdie has such limited thinking and zero view of the broader picture.

Why are modern warfare so gay?
You can't even get confirmation whether you down a few jets or not and both sides only care about social media propaganda

>>63833043 (OP)
>tryin to protect company stock
China reigns supreme. Asia is our turf. Africa is our turf. You can maybe visit maghreb. You lost gweilo.