>Russian troops installed a North Korean 107-mm Type 75 rocket system on a UAZ vehicle

>tiny MLRS with shit range and huge firing signature up close to the front line
Drones are going to slaughter these things.

>Bukhanka MLRS
sheeeeeaaattt

FPV food

>>63850929
wouldn't it operate far from the front line?

>>63850931
look at these short tubes, this shit has like 5km range

>>63850938
>>63850931
They are used more like mortars than MLRS.

>>63850915 (OP)
>Type 75 rocket system
What's the difference between this and the Chinese type 63?

soon

Behold, the power of the Russian MIC!

>>63850915 (OP)
Great Leader is dead.

>>63851094
could also be a RPU-14
the chinese made a complete copy as far as i know

>>63851123
It's 12 tubed and looks smaller than the RPU-14.

My brain that has yet to give up and declare everything russian and stupid looking as a serious atempt at a weapon tells me, that this is a leaked picture of some workers sending their boss conformation of a job done. Said job was about securing the weapon for its transportation to replace a worn out Type 75.

But oh the obvious answer that has been hammered ad infinitum is "yes the russians are this retarded" .

Its all so tiresome.

>>63850915 (OP)
Welcome back syria civil war

>>63850915 (OP)
>>63850919
I am particular impressed at how they removed the sights and any means of aiming it. They took a perfectly functional weapon that is ideal for quick deployment and relocation via ATV and ruined it.

>>63851584
How does a Type 75 get worn out?

The HIMARS at home

>>63851070
>>63850915 (OP)
These two are different. One is practically identical to Type 63 the other is simplified lacks elevation gearing and other bits.

>>63851626
Actually wtf you've AI'd the first picture. Yuck. Don't do that.

Someone is upset

>>63851690
>>63851701
>>63851706
I see the latest announcement that Russia needs Korean Engineers has caused yet more national humiliation in addition to the shame of needing to borrow 65 year old weapons designed by Mao.

>>63851626
the other pic is AI, you should've noticed by the fact it has a drawn style (and also it's too clean to be russia)

>>63851718
He's so assblasted he reverted to an older script lmao

>>63851719
Trump will be removing sanctions on Russia btw.

>>63851784
>>63851777
>>63851773
>>63851771
UH OH melty

>>63850919
>>63850915 (OP)
Why? It already has a well designed trailer that would work just fine with a four wheeler, if you have ATVs there is no reason to put it on a truck. It actually makes it worse, besides the loss of accuracy you can't drop it off and hide it anymore.

One of it's defining features is that it is designed to be broken into man portable loads so it can be snuck into a area to act as surprise support for exactly the sort of human wave attacks Russia is doing, they have somehow reverted to having pre Mao tactics.

>>63851777
Sure he will Mr Crowley.


>>63851771
I wonder if Russia is aware that no one has any idea what a Banderite is and would laugh at them if they did.

>>63851788

>>63851788
What happened to him, usually such meltdowns are reserved for smoking accidents and other donkey-tier humiliations?

>>63851809
get new material it's 3 years old

>>63851827
Presumably the whole fall of Iran has him acting up.
Post-Assad Syria kicking the Russians out of Tartus has now manifest as Russia pulling out of Mali/Sahel after the logistics became untenable.

Loss of Iran is going to be a larger issue, especially long term.

>>63851809
Why are you so mad? Did something explode in the so-called russia?

>>63851070
>unknowntechnology.ai

>>63851690
Ukraine is a NATO member? Y/N?
If Y what would happen were Russia to attack a NATO member?

>>63851899
>INFINITE POWER

>>63851862
I guess he will just call us all kikes, repeat the Zelensky banderite bullshit and move onto the next cope.

>>63851953
As they always do, yep

>>63851899
>remember sergei, the socket 1 and 2 are connected for infinite power and sheeit

>>63850915 (OP)
To stay on topic, apparently the Norks supplied cluster munitions for these things which is kinda neat if you aren't the ones getting shot at. I suppose it would make the tiny one and two shot launchers much more useful.

>>63852051
>range: 8 km
mortar tier

>>63852051
Jesus, we started with Armatas and Terminators are coming, Sarmat, world's second army stronk, and now we are discussing donkey supply lines for North Korean cluster rockets strapped to a UAZ.

>>63852059
It's been a wild ride my guys

>>63852055
It is literally meant to replace mortars, it is designed to break down into man portable loads. The idea was that it replaces medium mortars, by firing 12 shots at once then relocating it has more time than a traditional medium mortar to avoid counter battery fire.

>>63852059
I'm surprised Russia is wasting trucks on something that is conscript portable.

>>63852077
>t is literally meant to replace mortars, it is designed to break down into man portable loads. T
>600 kg, compared to a 120mm mortar it has 40% of the HE, it's less accurate and weights 4 times more
With a mortar you can put the same mass of HE on target in less than 20 seconds.

>>63852113
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soltam_K6
>16 RPM max, 4 RPM sustained
>14 kg projectile
>20 seconds=5 rounds (lol)
>70 kg

>Type 63 HE rocket: 18.8 kg
>12x18.8=225.5kg

So yeah, you are wrong.

>>63852064
>It's been a wild ride my guys
Who knows what wonders we are yet to see. This war has given the world so much... Both of the zigger death and the /k/ino variety. And something that I, as an europoor, really treasure - total collapse of the Russian cold war inventory.

>>63852077
>I'm surprised Russia is wasting trucks on something that is conscript portable.
You need a donkey to tow that, as e-scooters and golf carts would struggle to move the smekalka. And donkey lives matter.

>>63852186
>using the complete rocket weight instead the warhead (8 kg) or the HE (1.3kg)
anon... I...
Should I compare per weapon weight? 600kg vs 150kg, in that case the mortars are even better

>>63852253
>Ignoring the same for the mortar
Anon....

The weapon weight is spot on though, at least for the 12x version. It must have something going for it given how half the planet uses the damn thing including at least one NATO nation (Turks) who are making new 107mm launchers in various configuration.

Although i will point out one thing about weapon weight: You can't compete with zero. The launcher isn't strictly needed and i don't care how great you were at hand egg in high school your throwing arm isn't that good.

>>63850919
when i build shit out of angle iron i get called retarded but when russians do it it makes headlines.

another loaf gone

>>63850931
Not with a 5 mile max range.

>>63852340
>Anon....
why did I compare HE FILLING? Hello?

>>63852370
But without doing the same for the mortar round.

Its 8 vs9 kg HE btw.


>>63852362
8 to 11 for the more modern ones but it's mortar range.


Fun fact that we will probably see at some point: You can fire the rounds by leaning them against a rock or taping them to a stick like a gigantic bottle rocket then setting them off with matches.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bZqPBAaEWU

>>63850915 (OP)
Who brings a t-72 to a rodeo?

>>63852417
>Its 8 vs9 kg HE btw.
The HE filling is 1.3 kg for the rocket and 3.0 kg for an M933

>>63853519

That sounds much more reasonable, the numbers felt way off. The proportions are comparable given the 120mms larger size. Regardless the MLRS fires faster although the mortar obviously weighs much less.

I am leaning towards thinking that besides assaults and massed fires the mortar is superior if only due to the weight. Additionally the rockets only have one integral charge and mortars can be adjusted with better precision.
Besides specific uses the mortar is the superior general purpose weapon.

You Sir have won a internet argument and i concede.

>simpson poster
>tank gif from first days of war
holy shit did russia send every other type of shill to the frontlines?

>>63854207
Plz understand, budget is getting very tight