>>63853011 (OP)
The Ayatollah just "handed over" power to the IRGC, might explain the spam.

>>63853011 (OP)
>someone left "return-to-sender" mode turned on (again)

>>63853011 (OP)
>Iranian missile salvo back last year: 200 at a time
>Iranian missile salvo day 1: 100-150 at a time
>Iranian missile salvo day 3: 50-100 at a time
>Iranian missile salvo yesterday: 10-20 at a time
>Iranian missile salvo today: 3-5 at a time
what gives?

>>63853029
You realize he's the moderate? If anything Israel will be getting pounded harder. I'm drinking a shot for each dead kike

>>63853070
>Iranian missile salvo today: 3-5 at a time
And they still get through? Wow, thaads are useless

>>63853091
THAAD isn't in Israel. Also there haven't been any deaths from missile impacts in about 2 days now.

>>63853076
you're not gonna get very drunk then. Now, if you were drinking to every dead muslim...

>>63853100
>THAAD isn't in Israel.
Why post such easily disproveable lies?
https://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/how-effective-is-thaad-in-defending-israel-against-iranian-missile-strikes

>>63853076
Alcohol is haram.

>>63853091
Thaads work, but the US only makes like 100 a year. Yeah shooting tons of garbage before you get wiped out so a few get through is the meta, but no one in Iran is celebrating these strikes, its just a final chimp out of extremists without the support of their own prople.

>>63853164
>thaads work
>but they can't intercept a salvo of 3 missiles
Pick one

>>63853091
Iran has fired like 300 missiles against Israel and only killed about 20 civilians and 0 soldiers so their AD is either doing something, or Iranian missiles don't work

>>63853091
THAAD inly carries 8 Interceptors, that's Iron Dome.

>>63853076
Oh Christ this is going to be humiliating for Iran

>>63853076
>drinking
You're a shite Muslim

>>63853648
>>63853139
109
You realize it's not just Muslims who hate your guts?

>>63853684
Muslims and?

>>63853091
Clearly you are a little thirdie
Your English is terrible
And you ask passive aggressive little bitch questions rather than state points. Asian Muslim is my guess

>>63853703
Here I'll help

>>63853684
>crying to UN for ceasefire intensifies

>>63853076
>I'm drinking a shot for each dead kike
I don't have a horse in this race but it sounds like you're gonna go to bed sober

Also a good chart
"Secretly trying to get revenge" "try to start fights" "resort to framed questions in debate".

>>63853703
I'm Chinese
>>63853700
>even the faggots who we fund turned on us
Not a good look.

>>63853091
Good job triggering all the trannies

>>63853728
Sure
>>63853726
"Secretly trying to get revenge" "try to start fights" "resort to framed questions in debate"."

>>63853729
>get btfo
>I TrIGgER YoU!!!!1!

>>63853703
You're most likely Indian

>>63853757
I'm white
"Deflects blame"

>>63853076
>Israel will be getting pounded harder
With what? Every BM salvo has been weaker then the previous one. Kikes have air-superiority over Tehran and lil Donnie's been feeding them live sat data and munitions since the begining. Iran wasted their retaliation on PR targets, instead of going after strategic infastructure like powerplants and refineries.

>>63853011 (OP)

>iran is doing so bad israel gives them a freebie

truly, a godly and selfless people.

>>63853110
Pretty sure this is a war crime going by IHL and the Law of Armed Conflict

>>63853091
Leaving aside the (at least partial) failure of the Israeli IADS, did any of those impacts actually hit anything?

>>63853896
Either provide the chapter and verse that says it's a war crime, or gtfo.

>>63853971
https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/api-1977/article-52
Standard knowledge. Israel would need to demonstrate this building was assisting military operations and its destruction and the deaths of the journalists would give Israel a demonstrable military benefit.

>>63853978
>Article 52 - General protection of civilian objects
>2. In so far as objects are concerned, military objectives are limited to those objects which by their nature, location, purpose or use make an effective contribution to military action and whose total or partial destruction, capture or neutralization, in the circumstances ruling at the time, offers a definite military advantage.
Degrading your opponent's ability to communicate is a definite military advantage.

>>63853992
>Degrading your opponent's ability to communicate is a definite military advantage.
That's not a valid argument otherwise all forms of communication would be a valid target during wartime and that's clearly not true since Article 52 specifically prescribes times when a strike may be done against civilian objects.

Going by your argument any media organization, state-funded, publicly-funded, privately-funded, whatever, are all valid targets.

You needs to demonstrate the definite military advantage.