How the fuck has no other country ever made an answer for this?

>>63876455 (OP)
Because we literally got the tech from crashed alien crafts that no other country has access to

because america is a massive country with lots of money that came out of WW2 completely unscathed and on top. we wanted to continue to be on top so we dedicate a shitload of money to keeping our military number one.

we also suck up all the talent from shithole countries because high IQ people would rather live comfortably in the US than living uncomfortably in a shithole

Reverse engineered alien technology

Does the usa have hyper sonic missles ?

>>63876475
All true but you forgot to mention the recovered alien tech

>>63876455 (OP)
The only other country that needs a long range stealth bomber is Russia and they are broke.

>>63876495
You mean hypersonic maneuvering glide vehicles or just missiles that go faster than mach 5?
If the former no one has operational hypersonics, if the latter the V-2 is a hypersonic.

>>63876463
Yeah dude, well this ain’t it. UFO shit is literally out of this world compared to this shit. You’re telling me we full stopped at nuclear power? The tesla guy tried to warn about the Chinese using mass defying tech, and that we’re the only other people who have it.

>>63876455 (OP)
american superiority. the chinks are trying to catch up with the piece of shit Xi'an H-20 vaporware bomber though.

>>63876518
What are you talking about schizo

>>63876523
what part of it needs clarification?

>>63876503
Chinese Xi'an H-20 stealth bomber is in development and probably further along than the Russian Tupolev PAK DA.

>>63876455 (OP)
because they fucking suck

useless without magnets

>>63876529
China is an edge case IMO, they haven't been in the business of starting wars on the other side of the world so have lacked a requirement so far.
They would have a requirement it if they actually expect the US to enter a war over Taiwan or if they intend to become far more interventionalist in the future.
The fact they are actually building one makes me thing they might be planning to become more interventionalist once the US has geopolitically isolated itself.

>>63876455 (OP)
they did you just shoot it

>>63876531
Who said we needed shielding?

>>63876531
Fuckin magnets...

>>63876529
The problem with China is making the jet engine. Bombers need low bypass turbofan engines. China has yet to make their first ever one (WS-20)

>>63876455 (OP)
What the fuck do you mean? Every five seconds there's some dumb chink on this board telling you that China has quantum stealth defeating radar. Obviously they made an answer for it, they wouldn't just lie about something so important.

>>63876455 (OP)
Just fire hypersonics at their airbase.

>>63876509
USA has no operational V-2 left.

>>63876455 (OP)
There are only two countries that want to drop enormous bombs on countries on the other side of the planet to them. America and Israel. An Israel can just ask America to do it for them so why would they need to build these?

>>63876455 (OP)
Pretty sure west European countries could deter them but they're the least likeliest countries to go to war with Usa.

can't tell if you guys actually believe that the b-2 was made with alien tech or not

>>63876455 (OP)
Modern, richer countries like the EU and China, Japan, Australia etc. could probably deter them or already use stealth designs themselves. It's a thing built for dealing with broke shitholes like Russia.

>>63876455 (OP)
China did: https://www.twz.com/air/massive-chinese-stealth-flying-wing-emerges-at-secretive-base

>>63876455 (OP)
>>63877478
And they even made a 6th gen fighter to hunt down B-2s and other US high value assets in the Pacific too: https://www.twz.com/air/chinas-j-36-heavy-stealth-fighter-seen-flying-for-second-time

>>63877472
It came from Nazi wunderwaffen tech and who knows where that shit came from

>>63876455 (OP)
>answer for this

>>63876854
>low bypass
I meant high

Because after the 1970s nobody was interested in developing new large strategic bombers (which only nuclear-armed powers would even be interested in)

>"answer"
Did you mean a *defense mechanism* against it?
It is like any other radar-avoiding "stealth" aircraft. Do the best you can

>>63876463
nah lmao radar stealth is literally just math
>>63877484
Jack Northrop's flying wing autism is well documented and predates whatever the Nazis were doing.

>>63877484
This is libel against Jack Northrop.

>>63877481
>the ir heat coming off those engines will be brighter than a christmas tree on any satellites

>>63877581
No one has anywhere near the satellite coverage needed to reliably track aircraft in real time.

>>63876455 (OP)
Because the countries that matter will invest billions they would have spent on this rust crap into Xitter and Tiktok propaganda and take over the country without a single shot.

>>63876495
iirc the US determined they weren't worth it in the 60s

>>63877587
Not even the US?

>>63877707
You would need 24/7 high resolution coverage of the entire planet, so no. It's basically a tradeoff between detail and coverage. You can look at a wide area from far away or a small area really closely. Your options for high resolution imagery are to wait for your satellite to pass over the area you want to image, or have so many satellites that there is always one in position above a given point.

>>63876455 (OP)
Other countries have free healthcare and basic social services.

>>63877581
>doesn't know how to greentext
>too retarded to recognize inlet design
yup, it's summertime

I like how they're pointing at each other

>>63876550
They are building up and waiting until they are 100% confident they can overwhelm (then conquer) Taiwan and eject the US navy from the first island chain, if or when they do this and develop their own reusable rockets they basically have strategic parity and MAD with the US (can stage their boomer subs off of Taiwans east coast and straight into the Pacific Ocean undetected)

>>63877881
I agree with the rest but reusable rockets aren't a big deal strategically, it slightly reduces the cost of launching military satellites that cost tens to millions to build.

>>63876550
>they haven't been in the business of starting wars on the other side of the world so have lacked a requirement so far
China doesn't do it openly, but the entire belt and road debt slavery for roads is economic warfare on a scale never before seen since the USA's baby boom where they also exploited every developing nation into debt.

Once China has enough permanent debt to fund external wars to compete with US banks you will find they will absolutely start funding wars.

>>63876529
All made from 100% High Quality Industrial Grade Glycine from Donghua Jinlong

>>63877850
Also roads that are more asphalt than pothole, bridges that won't collapse for literally no reason, and are more interested in spending their money on things other than bailing out the hyper-wealthy and military Potemkin projects.

>>63877896
It is a debt trap but it's a debt trap for nations that historically have a really hard time repaying debt. It doesn't matter how much money you lend someone if they're unable to repay it and have no assets to seize.

>>63876455 (OP)
Turns out nobody has the industrial sector, expertise, understanding of material sciences or tech sector to even begin to develop a counter for a 2 billion dollar stealth bomber. Let alone funding it should one of their top shamans be graced with a vision of an advanced enough radar or similar countermeasure.

The amount of money the U.S. pours into R&D of literally anything and everything is astronomical. There are not many countries on the globe that are making caverns the size of small countries and filling them with liquid Argon to study Neutrinos. Japan comes to mind, but their version is smaller and their method different.

>>63877866
They're going to crash!

>>63876488
??? The F-35 has been clowning Iran's air defenses way longer than the B-2s

>>63877850
Where do you think most of the US budget goes towards? It's not weapons or gibs to Israel.

>>63876455 (OP)
No other country has the desire to spend trillions of dollars on losing wars of choice in the Middle East, leaving the home country so desolate it completely reverses from decades of outgoing manifest destiny to inward looking isolationist fascism.

>>63876550
>The fact they are actually building one makes me thing they might be planning to become more interventionalist
It's pure cargo cult.
As >>63877896 says, the Cantonese rely primarily on soft power, and have done so since the Shang dynasty. Which is why they call themselves "The Middle Kingdom", their expectation being for others to gravitate towards their sphere of influence to create an unequal codependency until they point they are vassalized.

>>63877953
They have plenty of assets to seize, geopolitical favors, land and raw materials in particular.

>>63877975
I don't think you know what a cargo cult is anon.

>>63877896
They are already funding the Myanmar civil war no? And it's not going very well for them, mind you. Their faction is loosing to a bunch of Karens.

>>63876455 (OP)
ICBMs are cheaper

>>63877967
Then why don't you have either of those? There are african countries with a more efficient healthcare system than the US

>>63877987
Oh really now?

>>63877681
>>63877364
Lol, both of these anons are spouting nonsense.

No, the US got hypersonics missiles since the end of the 1970s; but these are OUTDATED IN THESE DAYS !

So not only are the Russian lying, they acknowledge their idiocy.

>>63878001
The term you are looking for in plagiarism, cargo cults didn't understand how anything worked while China assumes the huge US MIC budget did a bunch of testing to find the best design and then makes a clone.

>>63877996
Nope, but US got planity of ICBMs

>>63877972
>No other country has the desire to spend trillions of dollars on losing wars
But that good then, since the US didn't lose any, despite your delusio.

>leaving the home country so desolate it completely reverses from decades of outgoing manifest destiny to inward looking isolationist fascism.

Just..cool it with the delusion, dude

>>63878030
>China assumes
lmao, they got everything they needed from Lockmart servers

Very simple

its expensive as fuck, advanced as fuck, and few countries have the strategic needs to build one

Only china is working on something similar because with they wish to replicate the way the USA has global influence (among other reasons)

>>63878046
Funny if true.

>>63877450
Holy shit the cope

>>63878191
How so? It's not too hard to detect them during patrols to get a lock. If you're implying Iran scenario where you rely only on outdated ground radars then nobody can lock on.

>>63876455 (OP)
Because everyone else is financially more responsible than the US.

>>63876455 (OP)
Not point treating this as incredible since they flew above a country that already lost all its air-defense and radar capabilities.

>>63877707
>>63877726
IMO that's only a question of money and launch-system. We could use bigger sat higher in orbit but it's ridiculously costly and satellite size is limited by launch system. Even Starslip wouldn't make it economical.

>>63876488
topkek

>>63877953
>if they're unable to repay it and have no assets to seize
Generally the thing being built is the asset that is seized.
Then you set tolls on your new highway/port/bridge and have a recurring revenue stream and potentially the ability to shutdown a major trade route at will.

>>63877990
Destabilisation efforts doesn't always have to lead to a winner.

>>63876475
>high IQ people would rather live comfortably
Money motivates the best entrepreneurs, but they will find niche anywhere.
DESU most high IQ people are motivated by exclusive oportunities. You cant really help with Moon landing, work on proper aircraft carrier, design bleeding edge AMD processor or produce Hollywood movie in Dubai, Paris, Zurich or even London. They just don't take up endavours of that scope and ambition highest IQ people aspire to contribute to.

>>63876529
Chinese engines are garbage. Always have been.

>Continent wide country with mostly European tier climate
>Settled by europeans
>Natural resources untouched during most of history
>Not affected by both world wars because of oceans
>Neighbors are incredibly weak and poor
The USA is OP beyond meassure and the worst part of it most of the overwhelming advantages of the USA were handed it to you in platter or its just luck,you didnt even fight your independence alone, Europe's biggest mistake was infighting instead of balkanizing it

>>63876455 (OP)
as soon as one flies over serbia, we'll find out what the answer is

>>63878001
This is convergent evolution at worst, you realize that if you make a program give you the most optimal shape for an aerodinamic and stealth plane it will give you the same answer no matter where the simulation took place? this aint WW2 with meatbags using their imagination and trial and error

>>63879105
Our climate and biomes are all over the place ranging from salt flats to swamps and rainforests. Mostly European doesn't mean shit since you mongs have been using the "harsh European climate" to explain the need for innovation and why the natives you kicked the shit out of never did any. You faggots make every excuse under the sun over why we AREN'T eruropean, don't cave now just because you got outdone again. Untouched is a funny way of saying "didn't destroy the forests being retards". WW2 was 80 years, ago move on, and in an economical sense it dragged you retards across the finish line, no amount of cope chest thumping about higher casualty numbers actually making you tougher will ever change that. The entire world is weaker and poorer than America, that is some mega cope. Stop being such a salty bitch.

Because USA takes up most of the continent.

>>63876455 (OP)
It's hard to match alien technology

>>63876455 (OP)
The Japanese had the Samurai, the Romans had the Legions, the British had the Longbows, the Persians had the Cataphracts, the French had the Musketeers.

Oh, the Americans? Well we have LONG RANGE STRATEGIC BOMBING. That's what we fucking have. That's what they're going to be making HBO series about in a thousand years. LONG RANGE STRATEGIC BOMBING is the coolest fucking shit on the planet Earth and I am tired of pretending it isn't.

"Oh you need boots on the ground" HORSESHIT. No you do NOT. You bomb your enemies into dust with impunity and then you fucking leave. That's what Long Range Strategic Bombing is, nobody ever says that a bomber "lost" because it flew awawy after it drops its bombs, so as long as we engage in LONG RANGE STRATEGIC BOMBING and nothing else, we de-facto cannot lose wars.

This is the new meta boys. LONG. RANGE. STRATEGIC. BOMBING. IS FUCKING BACK.

>>63879223
>nobody ever says that a bomber "lost" because it flew awawy after it drops its bombs
Definitely don't go read /pol/, they are trying to spin this as some great victory for Iran and an embarrassing defeat for America.

>>63877542
>Jack Northrop's flying wing autism is well documented and predates whatever the Nazis were doing.
>ng rolls out B2
>jack northrup rolls out in wheel chair
>Now I know why I lived this long!
Based Jack.

>>63879223
>You bomb your enemies into dust with impunity and then you...
>see them driven before you
>and hear the lementation of thier women

>>63879270
Forgot pic.

>>63879256
Oh I know, but this happens every time, it was the same way with the tomahawk missile barrage a few years back. Once it turns out they were retarded the third worlders and bots will just stop talking about it and everyone else will pretend they always knew it was based.

The way I think of it, the more wrong the majority of people are, the more delicious it is when I am proven right.
LONG RANGE STRATEGIC BOMBIIIIIIING! WHOOOHOOO!

>>63879223

based

It's a plane that will never have an equivalent. Even if the capability is replicated, the story cannot be. One man's lifelong dream, trial, incremental success, failures, until rolling something out that blew everyone away. There have been (and will be) other flying wings, but there will not be another B-2.

>>63879105
You forgot to mention that we also have the largest and most fertile tracts of farmland in the world

>>63876455 (OP)
The answer to this is long wave radar feeding tracking information to a missile/interceptor with an irst, ironically the 1960's f106 connected to the SAGE system could counter it.

The real reason nobody has done this is because the USA only deploys the b-2 once everything that could deal with it has been destroyed but by that point a b-52 would have worked just as well.

>>63879292
It might not have worked. But that's not an issue with the bomber, just the payload. I guess they could just keep hammering it?

>>63877726
You don't need 24/7 coverage of the whole planet, just of Chinese airbases

>>63877998
Because we fund the development for all the drugs that the free healthcare countries benefits from.

>>63879309
> most fertile tracts of farmland in the world
that is not true kek

>>63879461
Have you seen how unreal the yields in the corn belt are? Look at the Mollisols in Illinois specifically. It's unreal and it's not as cold as the same soil types elsewhere.

>>63879493
.... you can just google the largest agricultural producer and the world and then their area.
...
it's china. That is without GMO.
And I don't even need any number. Just look at what part of the world has/had the largest population before modern farming technology.

>>63879534
>chinky is still butthurt days later
lol

>>63879461
It is, US is closer to equator than Europe and gets more sunlight, but also gets 2-3x more precipitation on the east coast and in midwest and is cooled down by oceans. If tasked to engineer the perfect climate for agriculture, you couldn't make better conditions. Though, to be fair, the same sun+giga rain+cooling exist in Japan and on the east coast of China.

>>63879534
US grows the most corn, which is used for the US to produce the most beef and chicken. The reason for all the corn is meat.

>>63879613
give me a number of total production in $.

please don't tell me that the corn used to fed the cows are more expensive than the cows themselves next.

>>63876463
Do aliens only crash here in the US? Russia is pretty massive land wise, why havent any crashed there?

>>63879559
that's nice and all but you have a number?
and
>japan
lol
Don't post numbers then just feelings are enough I guess

>>63879105
Fun fact, the longest war US fought was against natives, and there were times they could have been decimated to the point of irrelevancy
>but le stone age subhumans
The moment they were capable to buy horses and guns and launch large raids the human group which will become the US had to become an entity capable to deploy standing armies, in fact the concept of "whites" within US was born occured when european migrants started to see themselves aa a group fighting amerindians. In many ways this is similar to what happened in Moscovia, with the key difference russians chose serfdom while americans used citizenship, the rest is history.

>>63879534
China doesn't even produce more than they consume lol

>>63879443
How does orbit work?

>>63879105
>>63879208
You're both wrong and right, you're both also retards
The US is ethnically, culturally and politically a bongoloid nation and the most naturally wealthy one to boot

>>63879542
I'm convinced the chink shills have humiliation fetishes. There's no other reason to continue posting here other than that you get off to being embarrassed and made fun of.

>>63879681
>in fact the concept of "whites" within US was born occured when european migrants started to see themselves aa a group fighting amerindians
Pretty sure that was derived from necessity from both slavery and the Spanish caste system based on non-European admixture.

>>63879443
This is not how satellites work. You can't park a satellite over a single point on the ground unless that point is on the equator. Anything else will require a constellation. Additionally, one satellite that can observe all of China at once will not have the angular resolution to detect and track individual aircraft. One which can resolve an aircraft will not be able to image all of China in a single pass and so will necessitate a large constellation to maintain constant coverage.

>>63879728
>>63879542
this is not your safe space. You will keep seeing impressive chinese technological advances and you will continue to seethe.

>>63879654
The point of growing all the corn is the feed the cows. Clearly you don't understand this topic and I am going to stop trying to explain it to you.

>>63879453
thank you wagie. work for my 9th vacation this year

>>63876463
Ironically, scientific basis came from Soviet Russia lmfao

>>63877953
All those shitty countries will just nationalize Chinese investments, like was done to American investments during the Cold War.

>>63879256
Oh, and we've also apparently started a new war because we performed precision strikes. I'm glad /pol/ is a containment board because it's containing all the third worlders seething with only a few stragglers coming here to get shit on

>>63879453
False
https://www.dhhs.nh.gov/sites/g/files/ehbemt476/files/documents2/pcmapatentsrxmonopolies032425.pdf

>>63876558
How do they work?

>>63877478
>>63877481
lol

>>63879208
>Harsh European climate
What
Let me peek my head outside for a second
Yup nothing but endless lush fields with non extreme climates and zero pests, mid of summer not even a mosquito and only 30C its literally as good as it gets

>>63877850
>free
Wrong.

>>63877998
>african countries with a more efficient healthcare system
That's why everyone goes to Africa when they really need expert care.

>>63878036
>since the US didn't lose any
Especially not that one they fought to prevent the spreading of communism to South Vietnam and Southeast Asia in general, yes?

>>63879534
China is completely dependent upon modern agricultural chemicals in order to maintain yields. They've overworked their best soils to the point where they basically have to replenish them with nutrients each year.

>>63880134
Is the sun shining?

>>63880144
yes, we pay taxes so that when we need our healthcare system we're not destroyed by millions of dollars of debt. And even if you don't pay taxes you in case you need it it's free.
So, yeah, it's literally free if you can't pay.
>>63880170
With heart diseases a lot of US millionaires are starting to come here to the EU.

>>63879660
They have but their unintelligible language is impossible to differentiate from the average drunk Russian.

>>63879936
Do you get depressed every time you look in a mirror and realize you're a hideous chink, that's gotta suck.

>>63876455 (OP)
becuz america is the best

>>63877481
>And they even made a 6th gen fighter to hunt down B-2s
I'd be a lot more concerned with their air to air missiles, and AWACS style planes
The fighter that's carrying the missile is a part of the equation, but only one part of it. all the other pieces are super important
and I dunno about you, but I'm not sure if china is capable of doing modern complicated air force missions in large numbers, or for long periods of time.

>>63877587
>No one has anywhere near the satellite coverage needed to reliably track aircraft in real time.
we can track where the aircraft are based, and then watch them like a hawk to see when they take off

>>63879041
Well obviously, they stole the blueprints from the US via Israel; of course its trash.

>>63877896
>Once China has enough permanent debt to fund external wars to compete with US banks you will find they will absolutely start funding wars.
you know we can just strong arm those nations into not repaying that debt right?
What are they going to say
"NO! I won't let you bully us into paying off that debt. We made a promise to those honest chinese businessmen, and by hell or high water, we WILL make each payment, on time. In fact, we'll even pay extra. Suck my limp biscuit, uncle sam!"
No, they'll just fold
they'll probably even thank us for giving them the excuse to stop making payments
those countries are... in really desperate situations. so uh... yeah. not exactly the most reliable payers

>>63880047
>All those shitty countries will just nationalize Chinese investments, like was done to American investments during the Cold War.
if push comes to shove, this is exactly what will happen
What is china going to do? Use its big scary navy and sail across the world just to collect on those debts?
now they're spread out, maybe spending more money to do that than they're even getting, and their military assets are all out of position
great time for them to have a tragic torpedo based accident, with an american attack sub watching just nearby (but unable to help, cuz you know, subs are underwater, what are they supposed to do???)
Tragic. So tragic
I don't think china's navy will do so hot when spread out all over the world.

>>63876455 (OP)
Because the Soviet Union was the only other country ever capable of making advanced aircraft and they haven't existed for 35 years and couldn't afford to make anything decent for decades before that.

>>63876455 (OP)
aerostats?

>>63880807
>then watch them like a hawk to see when they take off
You will know they've moved when they disappear between satellite passes. Maybe you can catch them taking off if you get lucky with the timing (they could just wait until your spy satellite isn't overhead though) You will not be able to watch them as they fly somewhere else in real time.

>>63879363
>The real reason nobody has done this is because the USA only deploys the b-2 once everything that could deal with it has been destroyed but by that point a b-52 would have worked just as well.
this

>>63880832
>You will not be able to watch them as they fly somewhere else in real time.
yeah I agree, but that's what other signals intelligence is for, and humint
I have a good feeling we'd be able to track their aircraft in ways they don't know about
satellite imaging is just the most obvious

>>63880839
This chain of discussion started with >>63877581 suggesting that orbital IRST could be used to track aircraft in flight. That's why I'm hammering this specific point.

>>63876455 (OP)
The real answer is that nobody else has the composite manufacturing tech to do it. The aerodynamics, stealth shaping, and material composition are pretty widely known these days, but the ability to actually make these complex shapes out of those advanced materials and have it come out strong enough to sustain airframe loads over decades of service is something that really has to be built up over decades and it's as much a matter of institutional experience as it is one of science. Just knowing how something is supposed to work can't replace having staffs of engineers, tooling makers, and manufacturing workers who actually know how to do it and there's really not much of a shortcut to that, especially in countries like Russia and China that struggle so much with corruption and shortages of skilled trades in advanced manufacturing. (Not that there isn't corruption in the US MIC, but US corruption is giving you what you asked for at an inflated price, Chinese corruption is an endless sequence of cost-cutting and pocketing the difference all the way down the ladder until you get 1/4 of what you paid for.)

>>63879660
>Do aliens only crash here in the US? Russia is pretty massive land wise, why havent any crashed there?
They have. All alien tech was quickly dismantled and sold for scrap by local vatniks before the army could arrive.

>>63880849
Oh, and just to add to this, there may be a few shortcuts they can take, but that means they'll get to our current level with 50 years of trying instead of the 80 it's taken us, and they're only on maybe year 20 of that process so they're still 30 years behind, and it's easily apparent when comparing their current stealth aircraft to ours - they've got most of the F-35 tech data, they know why the shaping is so complex, and there's a reason they're not doing it that way - and bear in mind that F-35 is 20 year old manufacturing tech at this point while the J-35 still hasn't reached real production yet afaik.

>>63880868
Not all of it. Where do you think vodka comes from?

>>63880872
>they've got most of the F-35 tech data, they know why the shaping is so complex, and there's a reason they're not doing it that way
This is something I'm actually curious about. The F-22s geometry is pretty simple in comparison to the F-35, definitely closer to the J-35, but by all accounts it's RCS is substantially lower.
Does it's more costly/maintenance intensive RAM really make up for that difference? Or is this simpler geometry with more flat surfaces actually better for stealth?

My intuition is leading me to believe that the lumps and bumps on the F-35 have more to do with space/volume constraints rather than being optimal LO features, but that's purely guesswork on my part.

Could've used B-52s if they were configured to take the bombs to do the job in Iran. The door was pretty thoroughly kicked in at this point.

>>63876455 (OP)
Serious answer? They can't keep up with our logistics and supply networks.

>>63880952
Something I noticed with the J-35 and J-20 designs even compared to the F-22, is that the F-22, despite being designed on much, much older hardware and software, still has a smoothness between the fuselage and the wing root where the J-20 and J-35, disturbingly, do not.

The stealthy Js, on a purely visual assessment, give off this *feeling* of "die-cast toy" that I do not notice with American production fighters. Even in your pic you can see how the wing blends very seamlessly into the body of the F-22, it's tiny lil chines doing the same thing with the intake and fuselage. And although the F-22 does present flat surfaces, their geometry is complex and again, seamless to the point where you can't easily discern precisely where a curve begins and where the flat edge ends.

>>63880952
Nta
The f 22 is built that way because it's a fighter. It's maneuverable and has stealth. It has so many little flight control surfaces and it's engines thrust vectoring is different. A human being could not fly it even with hydraulics there's just to many shifting parts of the plane. They kind of direct it at times that's it.

>>63880952
I don't think we really know either plane's true RCS, the best we have are 3rd party estimates done with software, but that can only go so far, there's a reason real-world radar testing is still such a big part of the development process. They may also be optimized for different radar bands, ranges, angles, etc. The plane is also built to different requirements and it's possible that the same general design done with F-22-level composite tech would actually be WAY worse than the actual F-35.

The lumps and bumps might just be a packaging thing as you say, but I think that also has to play into the RCS equation, they wouldn't bother with such complex and difficult shapes if they could just lower the bottom of the aircraft by a few inches so it could be flat and achieve a similar RCS.

>>63878257
Euros wouldn’t be able to detect or stop the flight of the b-2s coupled with American EW. You are coping and we are laughing

>>63879660
>Do aliens only crash here in the US?
Yes
>Russia is pretty massive land wise, why havent any crashed there?
No idea, you'd have to ask the Marsniggers

It’s just IQ. Boring, reductionist, not politically correct, but it’s an iron pillar of reality. Everything which makes the West super dominant in basically every advanced human endeavor boils down to IQ. Western populations just have the most high-IQs. Society, culture, science, etc, is ALL downstream of IQ. The reason why the US is the most dominant one of all is because it has the most Europeans with the best geography. However, this discussion is changing as Western IQs are steadily dropping for whatever reason. But for the time being we’re still dominant. And so what? I’m white, but I’m not a Nordic royalty, and I’ll NEVER have their beauty. I am high-IQ but there are a LOT of white people who are geniuses. I will never be the trail-blazer moving the field of human understanding forward, I will only ever be a senior engineer level. There are heights I can never aspire to because my IQ isn’t high enough, And that’s FINE. Who CARES. I don’t make it my life to seethe and cope over it.

In military terms, I’d be a staff officer, but never a general. Most people in the world could only be an enlisted, and most Europeans could become a NCO. Think about what this IQ pool means when you’re trying to build a strong officer corps.

>>63879703
>>63879850
Now imagine that you could launch your satellite up to a point where its rotation matches earth rotation. Think about it maybe you're into something

>>63882278
I know what a geostationary orbit is. It seems that you do not.
>>63882278
>You can't park a satellite over a single point on the ground unless that point is on the equator.

>>63880172
Correct. Forced the NVA into a treaty, which they then broke after the US military left.

>>63879223
based beyond acceptable proportions

because we got the southwestern states that are magnets for Ayy LMAO tech and hot latinas

Who else is getting “bored” of war? The West isn’t going to do wars anymore, period, and everyone else is a joke at it. So, what’s the point of talking about it unless you’re into lame do-nothing bombings and WW1 with drones?

>>63879660
When they do locals use alien space tech as magic heating lanterns. It’s like aliens version of crash landing on Sentinel island.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lia_radiological_accident

>>63883081
Maybe the hot latinas are the aliens

>>63879223
Why Curtis LeMay decided to possess the seal to tell me this I do not know. Maybe it was all that was available, maybe he drew the short straw in reincarnation. Some events are not meant to be understood, only witnessed.

>>63876463
why does everyone always reject the idea that hundreds if not thousands of people dedicated decades of their lives to solving a specific problem?

>>63879223
I've said for years that there's no problem that can't be solved by dropping a JDAM on it.
Sure, it might not be the kind of solution you were looking for, but it'll be a solution.

>>63879660
When ayys crash in Russia, they get raped and killed. When ayys crash in China, they get eaten. If I was an ayy, I would make damn sure I crash in the US.

European defense stocks being hammered after the legendary b2 raid. The market realizes that Europe couldn’t do that

>>63879410
Both the Iranians and the Israelis say it didn't work, but I'm honestly disinclined to believe them. The Iranians would lie if it were destroyed to see if they can bait the Americans into wasting another 16,000 tons of bomb on nothing, and the Israelis want the Americans to invade. I find it difficult to believe that this amount of force would not destroy the facility no matter how deep it was.

>>63879936
Are you in one of those WMAF reddit forums my dude? Your post gives off the energy of it.

>>63883081
wait until she turns 25

>>63883081
>hot latinas
Hi paco!

>>63879936
>implessive zhongguo technology!
Come back when you have an F-22, F-35, B-2 and B-21, insect. Get back to making my iPhone 17! Chop chop bug!

>>63876455 (OP)
Underground bases. No evidence the strike was effective at all.

>>63880952
Your premise is wrong because the F35 is stealthier than the F22.

>>63876455 (OP)

Because it requires an enormous amount of money and logistical support that no other nation could afford. China maybe can do something like this in the coming years, because they're going to have to be able to have air bases around the world in friendly countries that can help with fueling them for actual missions.

>same thread every hour since Iran got gaped
>same seething turdies, Chinks and Yuros posting Reddit tier butthurt
Lmao, remember you are all living in America.

>>63877726
https://www.sda.mil/tracking/

>>63884775
Nothing wrong with a little bleaching.

>>63885024
Detecting and tracking ICBM launches is not the same as tracking aircraft. Also it's not in action yet.

>>63877977
With their implessive navy and fleet of stealth strategic bombers I'm sure they'll have no trouble

No the B2 has litterally saved the world. Ceasefire confirmed reach.
Peace through bunker buster

>>63879302
11/10 kino photo

>>63887582
>Ceasefire confirmed reach.
senilebabble isn't a good source

>>63876455 (OP)
the answer is modern AD, or even outdated AD. which is why SEAD is still important, and why isreal ran that shit for days in advance. you can detect, and even shoot down one of them if you keep your radars on, scanning all the time, tracking every little anomaly. it's just that if you do that, you're probably going to get a HARM chucked at you.

>>63880799
>I'd be a lot more concerned with their air to air missiles
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PL-15
>and AWACS style planes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaanxi_KJ-500
these things aren't exactly hard to make, they're not alien tech. at the end of the day it's the stealth coatings, AI, chips, engines that are hard.

>>63876463
glowniggers rebuking this response makes it fpbp

>>63883558
Because they are lefties they must hate trump and America and never say something positive

>>63887992
>AI
>the didn't hear about deepsneed

>>63877478
>>63877481
Bug delusions.

>>63879660
If you're a tourist, are you going to somewhere where people LIVE or where they die sadly?

>>63877481
have they fixed AWACS?

>>63877587
>>63877707
i know that nobody's made a thread on this thing since god knows when, but the US has the coverage. the shit SBIRS+DSP can monitor and track is practically cheating. there's a reason the US is the only nation in the world playing without the fog of war.

>>63877371
You are an incorrect homosexual.

>>63888304
Even these have pretty substantial limitations. The way some people talk about satellite surveillance/monitoring gives the impression that they think countries can have 24/7 live video feeds tracking every ship and plane in their adversaries' military

>>63888327
>intense IR

>>63888247
>2 billion dollars
>4 engine
>subsonic
>no turn
kek
With the PL-15 it's like shooting fish in a barrel. Like within 50 miles it's dead ahahaha

>>63887582
Ceasefires are lame though. The war was fun. I hope one of them breaks it soon.

>>63888332
>>63888247
oh wait now that I've thought about it. The poos outside of loos did pretty well vs the PL-15. The USAF should learn from them: using Rafael to intercept the PL-15. It worked!
So next time it's gonna be the F22/F35 intercepting the PL-15 to protect the B2. They have to be stealthy to the PLAN does not know the exact number of PL15s to fire. Next level genius!!

>>63888359
You are literally british, relax bud

>>63888359
>muh pl15
Trash like your ping pong shilling

I bet he paints the shape of a Rafale onto his ass and then rams a dildo resembling a PL-15 up it to own the gweilos.

>>63888327
the combination is good enough to spot grads and call ahead to warn the target of incoming fire. getting an overhead of the battlespace multiple times an hour is better than anyone else has. you won't have a perfect flightplan, but you'll have enough advance warning to narrow any subsequent search you need to do in an active scenario, and enough data otherwise to have intel-heads construct a report afterwards.

>>63877998
Because we have vampire middleman that spin profit.
Health care in the us is very good. Access is really bad

>>63883081
You posted my wife