>>63890934200 was the number I heard also. Do we have any information on where they are based?
Does China have stan/eval/test squadrons like our VXs? I would assume so but I've never heard about those or aggressor squadrons over there.
>>63890753>in that regard it's closer to a Flanker/MiG-31 or F-14 than a F-22Yeah I always figured it was sort of an analogue to the canceled super Tomcat with more emphasis on LO. Kind of surprised its not a two seater considering its notional interceptor role and long-range.
>>63890731I think J-35 is also available for export as well right? I dont believe the J-20 is. Everybody knows about the Chinese engine woes but I'm curious about the level of their RAM tech and sensor fusion.
>>63889484J-35 is set up for CATOBAR/ carrier ops in one variant. I don't think there are any plans to navalize the J-20 (probably not practical due to size and low speed handling)