https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pAFjY-Pm5g

Documentary of the KF-41 is up in HD. It's full of lewds

Great, now Hungary has all the gears it need to coordinate a joint final assault from the west side border to reclaim their former land that “the Borderland” has wrongfully occupied since 1921 :)

Cv-90 enthusiasts on suicide watch, especially after its underperformance in Ukraine

>>63889586
>underperformance in Ukraine
proofs?

>>63889586
No kino = nothingburger armored vehicle. There’s a reason you don’t see cv threads anymore despite being so popular pre war

>>63889562
doubt that will ever happen

https://youtu.be/X8VYFviVDA4?si=R2jZEJs6GsLkb4bL&t=477

>>63889562
Randy, get out of this thread

>>63889607
To be fair though, the fucking Chadley has gon above and beyond performance in the current conflict. It's wayyyyy moreprevelant after proving itself the premier zigger remover. Shame Agent Orange cut off all the new TOW and other ammo deliveries. I was hoping for more T90 rape kino. But, alas.

>>63889586
Who has the most users krautshill? BTW have they figured out how to install colour screens in this IFV? Or is it still in black and white.

>>63889586
>ukraine claims its one of the best weapons supplied
>hurr durr its actually underpfrofming becase, because well it just is ok!

>>63889607
From this interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fjn2U6ZHQs
>There are questions from the audience about how the CV90s performed on the battlefield, and why is there less information about them than, for example, about the Bradley? There is a lot of information about the Bradley, and it looks impressive and serious. What about the CV90?

>Let me tell you why. We have brigades that do not disseminate information about the results of their combat activities, and we have brigades that do disseminate information and fight partially live. That's why M2 got into the live broadcasts and everyone knows about it, and CV90 did not, so no one knows about it. In terms of efficiency and security, these IFVs are in the same class.
https://desuarchive.org/k/thread/61716669/#q61716873

>tldr
Opsec is the reason why the Bradley got the spotlight, not because it is performing any better than the CV90. They are about equal in performance although they mention the CV90 being more advanced in terms of its firepower and FCS.

>>63889586
CV90 is from 90's. Hence the 90. It performed well in Ukraine.

>>63890880
>puff piece
>meanwhile it sees no actual use
you are seething pretty hard right now

>>63890888
>It performed well in Ukraine.
May we see a video of this performance?

>>63890872
Why would number of small nation users matter? It’s a jobs program. No serious military uses them and that speaks volumes. The UK, France, and Germany are the 3 top militaries in Europe and they all refuse to use the KEK-V

>>63891537
your daddy seems plenty entertained and he has had to enjoy plenty of impactful performances, if you know what i mean

>>63891917
This wasn’t funny at all

The KF-41 is a souped up Marder, which is a design dating back to the 1960's.
Rheinmetall developed it as an alternative for poorfag 3rd worlders who can't afford the KMW Puma.
It's alright but ... idk why anyone would get excited about it.

>>63892575
The layout of the chassis does resemble the Marder, but it was improved in every possible way. The lance turret is also far more advanced. Compared to slav tech it's like space tech.

also
>drives well
>handles well
>more reliable than the Puma
>accurate as the Puma
>pretty well protected
>costs half as the Puma

It is a cheaper variant, but that also means the parts are cheaper, simpler, thus less prone to failure. The crew can be trained in a shorter time period too.
To put it simple. The KF-41 and the Marder was made for war, the Puma was made for parades.

>>63892430
well yeah, what would you expect after that

Any WEBM requests?