>>63899034 (OP) In this load out, sure. But you can fit a lot more bombs if you have a tanker tagging along. Also, you better not be doing any low-level tactical flying or BVR engagements at those ranges
>>63900799 i think they had different mission types some were ballistic missile hunters that need lots of fuel and refuelling but others that are just bomb-taxis can bomb iran without refueling even some of the remote parts of it
>>63903919 its dead weight if you're not gonna use it apache was mostly used for air to air, the autocannon can carry like 1000+ rounds and aim9 missiles.
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 8:21:36 PM No.63904142
>>63903900 >With a fully tanked F15 you can go anywhere
>>63903343 to replace israel's 40-years old eagles. not those mudhens in op.
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 9:01:10 PM No.63904345
>>63903900 "I-I've never been here before," he said. "F-15s could be anywhere... I HATE F-15!"
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 9:17:04 PM No.63904455
>>63903392 wrong, that's an early f-16i that still had lantirn pods >>63903404 wrong, the pod on the port side that you can clearly see is lantirn's navigation pod