I'm convinced iranian missiles are far superior to Chinese ones. China simply doesn't have the luxury of testing their missiles in a real war environment. The Iranians have been building on their experience since the 80s. Maybe we'll get to see Chinese missiles in action soon if they provide Iran with BMs to strike Israel, but that seems unlikely.

>>63903674 (OP)

>>63903674 (OP)
We know they are good because their very existence makes every mutt on /k/ seethe uncontrollably.

>>63903674 (OP)
>disclose.tv
Why not just post any random brain vomit from the usual shit colored turd worlder polluting twatter? It would carry the same weight as far as truthfulness and legitimacy goes.

>>63903708
We generally don't give a shit about Chinese gear one way or another. It's the endless low-effort china numbah wan shill threads that are the problem.

>>63903674 (OP)
It's hard to say. But I don't think China spared much for iran.

>>63903674 (OP)
Surely Israel will be paying us back for all of those missiles they used, right?

>>63903699
Seems like the smaller waves still make it through. And those are pretty good numbers for the most heavily defended airspace in the world

the best iranian stuff is around pershing ii in capabilities (some reported to be faster). irbm with a marv.

china's older df-21, the original "carrier killer", is basically the same thing. i'm pretty sure they literally copied pershing ii, unlike the iranians.

Their air-to-air missiles do their job against Rafales
But the anti-air system is useless

>>63903732
https://www.reddit.com/r/LessCredibleDefence/comments/1llcy70/us_used_up_1520_percent_of_its_global_thaad/
I'm sure this is more up your alley

>>63903699
if we're to believe these figures, we're to believe iran downed 5 f-35s.

on day 1 alone, i counted far more than 4 unique hits from video evidence.

>>63903745
What Israel did to Iran is worth much more than that, Literally best $1B ever spent

>>63903699
Do you have a source for that I want to argue with my brainwashed Iranian coworker

>>63903674 (OP)
considering they just started another purge of their missile corps? no. the best metric we have for whether or not something china is using is good or not is if the person in charge of it is ousted during internal reviews. in this case it appears they're about to disappear the dude who was in charge of their missile forces for embezzling, which means it must be in a pretty shit state.

>>63903708
>talks about other people seething
>when this tourist's SOLE reason for being here, day in, day out, day in, day out is to shill for his favourite shithole and seethe at the board's denizens
kek
you disprove any notion of anyone else seething by the simple fact that you don't belong here and wouldn't be here if not to cheer on the shitholes that you think will finally make you feel less inferior next to western perfection.

>>63903745
>>63903826
Not only that, but it goes to show the US they're gonna have to boost their production of THAADs and work out some kinks. These kinds of things benefit the US a shitload because it goes to show flaws and weaknesses within our systems and structures, as well as their strengths. What we spent in Israel was plenty for Iran sure, but it's probably pretty safe to say China is able to keep up volume longer than Iran can.

>>63903674 (OP)
and they used many other assets too. GOPkikes won't utter a single complaint about spending billions in a week for the defense of Israel as they start multiple wars of aggression
they're owned and paid for by the jew lobby

>>63904217
You're arguing for one of two things. Which is it?
>We should have lots of weapons and keep making more but make sure to never ever use any of them, "just in case"
They're made for this purpose. To be used. Having 85% of a specific type of missile compared to last month is completely fine.
>"We" shouldn't make or use weapons at all
Then in that case, sorry thirdie, the weak have to submit to the strong.

>>63903766
>plebbit
Go and stay go

>>63904247
i argue the kikes should pay us

>11th day of the special synagogue shielding

>>63903674 (OP)
They should fire some at India and then we'll see

>>63903826
>financing the Greater Israel jewhad is good for the US
All of these wars have bankrupted our country. Israel is a black hole of money.

>>63903750
attrition works on the defenders as well
the first wave should be composed of largely decoys (like older scuds with 10 decoy warheads)

>>63904478
any money isreal pays would just get added to next seasons military aid bill

>>63903826
It's not. It's going to be so fucking hilarious if in a month or two Iran does a nuclear test.

>>63903674 (OP)
>make fun of mutts for malding about chyna's missiles
>comment deleted, 3 day b*n for "trolling"
Yeah, chinks really got you nervous huh. Kind of sad to see.

>>63905112
>seethe about people making fun of missiles
>identify yourself as a dejected thirdie by calling people making fun of you a mutt
>seethe that you get banned, likely because you were ban evading in the first place
wew
>c-chinks really got you nervous huh
your heavy breathing tells me you really want this to be true, because your own life is so insignificant you put all of your remaining hope in china so they can somehow hurt the US for you.

again, the only reason you're here is because you're mad and dejected, stop seething and the issue solves itself.

>>63903750
>And those are pretty good numbers for the most heavily defended airspace in the world
That's getting lost in the sauce, dude. Missiles aren't an end in and of themselves. Unless you can achieve some sort of actual objective, there's no point to launching an attack. The fact that the Israeli ABM network not being 100% effective is being held up as some sort of triumph is pretty damning evidence that the Iranians didn't achieve much of anything with their missile campaign. Certainly nothing commensurate with the amount of resources they poured into their MRBM and IRBM programs over the last two decades. And deep down, Iranian supporters know that's true because they feel the need to insist there's been massive damage inflicted somewhere offscreen but that the Israelis have (somehow) managed to successfully hide all of it.
Calling the Iranian's performance "pretty good" on the basis that some of their rockets managed to land in Israel reminds me of the story of the native gunners who spent all day firing at a flagstaff and cheered when they finally hit it--- all because it was only part of the enemy fort they could see from where they were standing.

>>63906046
what objective do you think they didn't reach?

iranians forced a ceasefire because israel ran out of interceptors. iranians now are digging out their enriched uranium that the US couldn't destroy.

>>63903674 (OP)
>iran real use
>muzzie iq

>china no use
>lies about performance so they dont get purged
>still take all the rocket fuel to sell on black market
>gets purged


iran by a long shot.

>>63905100
>does a nuclear test
And that's the point where USA doesn't even bother to try and be reasonable and does send in ground forces and dismantles that shit bit by fucking bit. Willing to bet India and China would be interested too. Don't want another Islamic state with nukes when Pakistan already has them and dislikes India and China.

>>63905100
Is this the brown world equivalent of 'two more weeks' ?

>>63906506
What planet are you living on? China is closer to Pakistan than Russia

>>63906589
What does Russia have to do with anything I said? China doesn't want Iran with nukes because Iran doesn't like the way China has treated Muslims in China. Pakistan has nukes and it is only India's existence that keeps them preoccupied with them instead of getting mad that China is persecuting Muslims.

Point is, China and India don't want Iran to get nukes because it shakes up the status quo and causes a situation for them which requires their geopolitical aims to be restructured.