Thread 63907845

Is the J-15T set to become the longest-range carrier-based fighter in service? With CATOBAR, It means It can carry full payload and fuel, thus it outranges both the F/A-18E/F and Rafale-M.

>>63907845 (OP)
seems so, makes me sad that we ditched the tomcat.
though these things would still lose in a fight against any of the lighter current western carrier fighters, worse radar tech, training and missiles and all that.

Maybe, but it seems somewhat pointless when their carriers are only ever going to do shorter range stuff. Naval Flankers just are not ideal, taking up a lot of deckspace for an aircraft that overall is not very remarkable. J-35 could actually be one of the better Chinese design decisions.

>>63907907
It literally takes up less space with It's wings and horizontal stabilisers folded than the Superhornet

>>63907845 (OP)
No because chink lies about its range

It's literally a Flanker retard

>>63908127
His point is the CATOBAR Flanker, only the J-15 is CATOBAR

>>63907845 (OP)
Implessive
He's gonna post the gay-porn Winnie-the-Pooh any second now.

IMPLESIVE

>>63907845 (OP)
Wumao gets btfo, and creates another thread. Vely impleassive, vely ching khu lung

>>63908094
>It literally takes up less space with It's wings and horizontal stabilisers folded than the Superhornet
no it doesn't, just look at your picture retard

>>63908320
Do you even know how carrier aircraft are deployed on a carrier?

>>63908350
>flanker is clearly bigger
>"noooooo that doesn't matter for some reason!"

>>63908297
>DBF07.webm
posted it again awards
Banning Norinco caused some serious emotional damage

Implessive

>>63907845 (OP)
Yeah

>>63907845 (OP)
Nobody cares.

Btw heres my chinky drip.

>>63907861
>worse radar tech
Anyone who think China has worse radar has been living under a rock.

>>63909278
>Anyone who think China has worse radar has been living under a rock.

>>63909002
>>Btw heres my chinky drip
>posts a image of his bed sheets