Anonymous
6/29/2025, 5:22:00 PM No.63912831
Would you rather your army have air power but soldiers are armed with muskets or your soldiers have Modern rifles but no airpower.
Replies:
Thread 63912831 - /k/ [Archived: 762 hours ago]
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 5:25:56 PM No.63912842
>>63912831 (OP)
Depends on so many conditions and factors. Are we invading? What are they armed with? Do we need their oil?
Depends on so many conditions and factors. Are we invading? What are they armed with? Do we need their oil?
Replies:
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 5:26:46 PM No.63912844
>>63912831 (OP)
Air power + muskets, easily
Air power + muskets, easily
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 5:27:40 PM No.63912847
Air power and it isn’t close
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 5:33:12 PM No.63912873
>>63912831 (OP)
Air power is overpowered. Just think. Would you rather face an alien in his spaceship or be able to punch the bitchlet midget in the face in a one on one?
Exactly.
Air power is overpowered. Just think. Would you rather face an alien in his spaceship or be able to punch the bitchlet midget in the face in a one on one?
Exactly.
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 5:34:31 PM No.63912882
Depends on the air power. If it's Ka-50s I'll pass.
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 5:34:34 PM No.63912883
>>63912831 (OP)
why are people always asking questions that try to downplay the importance of airpower?
you dont see people askingf if you can win wars without artillery
why are people always asking questions that try to downplay the importance of airpower?
you dont see people askingf if you can win wars without artillery
Replies:
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 5:39:02 PM No.63912904
>>63912895
Say Something like iran iraq war but without the sea being a concern
Say Something like iran iraq war but without the sea being a concern
Replies:
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 5:43:19 PM No.63912923
>>63912904
Then yeah air support. You can just gun them down from the air and the troops can recover and use their weapons.
Then yeah air support. You can just gun them down from the air and the troops can recover and use their weapons.
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 5:55:08 PM No.63912982
>>63912831 (OP)
This but with crackheads using modern rifles vs guys with muskets.
This but with crackheads using modern rifles vs guys with muskets.
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 6:29:28 PM No.63913131
>>63912831 (OP)
We talking about just infantry weapons? If it's just soldiers replacing M4s with Springfield muskets I'd take the air power, but if it's the Duke of Wellington's army with F-35s vs the US army with no air support I'd take the US army.
We talking about just infantry weapons? If it's just soldiers replacing M4s with Springfield muskets I'd take the air power, but if it's the Duke of Wellington's army with F-35s vs the US army with no air support I'd take the US army.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 6:53:38 PM No.63913238
>>63912831 (OP)
Would you rather have soldiers AND air power armed with black powder, or just soldiers with modern rifles?
Would you rather have soldiers AND air power armed with black powder, or just soldiers with modern rifles?
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 7:06:27 PM No.63913292
>>63912883
You can if you have enough air power.
You can if you have enough air power.
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 7:11:07 PM No.63913306
>>63912831 (OP)
Modern rifles and no airpower sounds cool. I wish all wars were fought like that.
Modern rifles and no airpower sounds cool. I wish all wars were fought like that.
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 7:13:17 PM No.63913318
>>63912831 (OP)
Is artillery affected too? Because if so then I'm just imagining Napoleonic warfare with jets.
Is artillery affected too? Because if so then I'm just imagining Napoleonic warfare with jets.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 7:21:38 PM No.63913355