https://x.com/idrwalerts/status/1939163507519549875

>>63914047 (OP)
Honestly it could work, pajeet incompetence notwithstanding.
I wonder though if the penetrator could survive the forces involved in a mach 3-5 impact. As far as I know MOPs are already skirting the engineering limits of the alloy they use while going subsonic

>>63914047 (OP)
How effective are bunker buster warheads when mated with ballistic missiles?

>>63914047 (OP)
It’s so funny seeing third worlders consistently treat LLM output as if it was the bible
>hold on I need to consult grok on this tweet

>>63914047 (OP)
a mouthbreather made this thread

>>63914224
>implying first worlders aren't doing the same

>>63914222
More kinetic energy is always better, but you'll face diminishing returns and need exponentially more speed to get much further.

>>63914239
Ok provide 95 examples of first worlders doing that, I’ll wait. Yeah that’s what I thought

>>63914271
The US government. That includes DOGE and the DoD

>>63914047 (OP)
>GBU-57 on steroids
>Half the weight
yeah

>>63914279
maybe consult grok next time ranjeet

>>63914291
I accept your concession.

Does this classify as a biological weapon since it's made by poojeets?

>>63914047 (OP)
>GBU-57 on steroids
>half the mass of the GBU-57
Sure.
>We don't have a bomber that can carry our bunker buster so we're gonna attach it to a fucking ballistic missile
Kek, I guess that works. Not sure about the accuracy though, unless there's some kind of terminal guidance system attached to the penetrator.

>>63914047 (OP)
>Literally half the mass
>"""copy"""

It's a fucking Tallboy with a body kit.

>>63914328
There's something that looks like grid find at the back, I assume it is meant to maneuver at low supersonic speeds

>>63914350
Grid fins*

>>63914350
>There's something that looks like grid find at the back
Just like the MOP

>>63914350
>low subsonic
grid fins are great for subsonic and supersonic control, they are draggy at transonic speed.

>>63914252
>More kinetic energy is always better
Big Burger Bunker Busters hit at subsonic speeds.

Because the best material for borrowing through earth, stone and reinforced concrete isn't always that good at either staying a solid at ICBM speeds or at not shattering pointlessly when striking anything at those speeds.

>>63914350
>There's something that looks like grid find at the back
Yeah, because it's a picture of the US MOP, brainlet.

>>63914371
Read the post again, it says low supersonic.

>>63914318
Hey! I remember posting the original like 3 years ago!

>>63914047 (OP)
We just saw what a war between stealth fighters and ballistic missiles looks like... the ballistic missile side got WIPED

>>63914421
>stealth fighterers
they were dabbing on them with 4th gen fighters

>>63914377
How about tungsten rods from god?

>>63914214
It is trivial for ballistic missiles to go that fast. They actually slow the MOP down to Mach 1 because it would have negative impact on penetration

>>63914047 (OP)
>designation: GPU-57(Guided Poo Unit 57)
Wonder how many giftcards you have to redeem for one of these

>>63914421
Pretty sure Iran claimed victory. A side that got actually wiped doesn't claim victory.

>>63914047 (OP)
AGNI!!

>>63914668
I want you to read what he wrote afain.

>>63914808
Anon they don't have a functioning air defense system or air force anymore, plus hits to other capabilities like nuclear program and the spending/losses of a decent part of their ballistic missile stockpile. Your enemy retaining the ability to defend against your attacks while you lose yours is no measure of success.

>>63914408
Why are indians even more disgusting than blacks?

>>63914222
That REALLY depends on the missile's CEP

>>63914808
>A side that got actually wiped doesn't claim victory.
Your first Muslims vs. Israel war, huh?

launched from an icbm, you'd end up with an impact velocity of about mach 4-5 if you want accuracy (he; you'd use artificial means to slow it down), or about mach ~13 if you don't care about accuracy (nuke).

you wouldn't gain much if you want to hit a point target with he/ke.

>>63914047 (OP)

>>63914222
Fairly decent but you sort of end up in a mad mix of finding the heavy lift rocket, making it hit something that's not 'about couple of suburbs' accuracy. The design of the warhead sort of factors in a lot of fairly complicated physics to get the big heavy lump of metal into the dirt, while figuring out when it goes off or turns into a crushed mess dozens of metres underground.

>>63914047 (OP)
>Using nuke carriers to launch HE warheads
So what about the strategic equation?

They're not WMDs. But pakistan doesn't know that. It sees an ICBM coming at it, launches nukes?
How does this even work?

>>63914408
Nothing like taking a morning india after a fresh coffee

>>63914047 (OP)
AI is alright sometimes

> Until more technical details or independent verification emerges, it's safer to assume that while the Agni-V will likely be a potent conventional missile with a large warhead, its bunker-busting penetration claims may be more aspirational than currently achievable with a simple large explosive fill.

>>63914408
This doesn't make any sense.
There's spike around South Georgia Islands, a stretch of Antarctican coast, and NE Australia.

Map is sourced from NOAA tsunami website. This is most likely ocean wave height from some tsunami that occurred in the area.

>>63916792
You went a bit too fat there - they are not trying to actually build one to use it, it's to show off that they have the bigger toys. Which is a win in their world.

It's somewhat similar to their domestic tank and fighter programs - they are less about domestically produced tanks and fighters, they are about being able to say that they have a domestic tank/fighter program.

As we've seen recently, if it comes to real fighting that is done by both sides with proven weapons they bought somewhere else. Which is convenient for the face saving aspects of their cultures: If they lose (with) them it was because they had to use inferior weapons made by other people, if they win with them it shows their (as a people, not the weapons) superiority.
Concepts like "a tool is as useful as the user is skilled in its use" are completely foreign to them. Which paradoxically prevents them from seeing those tools as just tools.

>>63916839
>*far, not fat
I'm a spellinglet today.