Okay so what if Washbear, but you print it up in Nerf colors and put a Nerf logo on the sides and an orange barellette on the front?

>what if disguised weapon
AOW

>>63919606 (OP)
then you'd have a colorful washbear that says nerf on it
what did you expect? an award? this has been done already

>>63919610
You're already fucked if police catch you with a printed gun.

>>63919614
>this has been done already
Pics or it didn't happen.

>>63919616
if you live in a shithole, otherwise they're totally legal
>>63919620
fuck off, newnigger

>>63919606 (OP)
Creatures of the night were already doing this before 3d printing with a dremel, squirt gun, and can of orange spray paint (shotgun too).

>>63919632
That's a gun stuck in the guts of a nerf gun, not quite the same thing.

>>63919646
>That's a gun stuck in the guts of a nerf gun, not quite the same thing.
are you fucking blind? its literally a 3d printed chassis with a 3d printed glock in it
besides saying "its not the same", you're splitting hairs, as its the same idea
>make gun in nerf color with nerf logo
>profit???

where the hell are you even trying to go with this?

>>63919659
>its literally a 3d printed chassis with a 3d printed glock in it
I saw the news reel, the glock pistol is just inserted into the nerf frame, the frame itself is just a bunch of extra weight.
>>63919639
Same here, looks like a shotgun stuffed inside a gutted out watergun.

Whereas the washbear has the stylistic look of a nerf gun and needs only be constructed of ABS and Nylon of the right colors

>where are you going with this?
There are many places where people wouldn't look twice at a nerf gun but it is very illegal to have a pistol.

>>63919676
>There are many places where people wouldn't look twice at a nerf gun but it is very illegal to have a pistol.
okay? you do realize the cops will still take it, right? if your door gets busted down, the cops are gonna turn your entire house
its a common tactic in places like australia to make a gun look like a toy, meth sheds are raided all the time there & they're found

if you're gonna actually make one, don't fucking fedpost & get yourself caught, like you're doing right now

>>63919676
>There are many places where people wouldn't look twice at a nerf gun but it is very illegal to have a pistol.
If one needed to use a gun in an area with strict laws, I would not walk around brandishing anything, much less a nerf gun as an adult. Cops are trigger happy and if they see/ get calls about a dude walking around with a nerf gun you will get ventilated.

If you need to use a gun brandishing it beforehand is never a good idea. There are essentially no scenarios where your idea would be of much benefit. Not to mention different colors of filament for 3d printers cost more, and also often have different properties from one another.

>>63919697
No, just had the thought while killing time looking at the more famous 3d printed guns.

>>63919632
>otherwise they're totally legal
They'll still put you on a list.

>>63919798
you're on a list for using this site

>>63919800
IP changes throughout the day, can't tell you how often I inherit some ban on /v/ for scat posting that's years old.

>>63919606 (OP)
If it's made to look like a toy you might catch a charge depending on who sees it, and it might stick depending on your state and lawyer. Doesn't stop some people from doing it. The politicians are further worried about 3dp guns because people tend to make them in bright colors, Michigan tried to ban guns that were non standard colors but it didn't get much traction.

>>63920226

>>63920227

>>63919606 (OP)

>>63920226
And what, pray tell, would you be charged with exactly?

>>63920507
A disguised gun is an "any other weapon" under the nfa, marking requirements for toy guns are clearly defined in law and making a real gun that meets them is a pretty obvious violation. All gun laws are infringements, but it's really more of a toy gun law, and thumbing your nose at something that actually does protect kids is an asshole move.

>>63920507
Not to mention local DAs can always pop you for breach of peace or criminal mischief or something specific to their state if you're doing something interesting with a firearm.

>>63919646
That's a Roni chassis painted up

>>63921933
It's a bunch of retarded dead weight is what it is.

>>63921933
So the weight was what gave it away, it's just a paintjob.

>>63920226
Where does this one fall? It's a functional firearm made in protest of the frame and receiver rule, constructed mainly from a nerf gun and a pipe

>>63919606 (OP)
What about
>Nerf Maverick modified to take snake blaster shells, with metal barrels+some way to make a pressure seal, (could it be done with plastic assuming the shotshell makes a good gas seal with its brass butt?)

>>63919606 (OP)
Amusingly on the ATFs ghost gun page they used a picture of a standard washbear as an example of an aow.

>>63924639
Probably the most worrisome one out there given that it's semi-auto and almost 100% printed.
The Ryno PIP revolver might be more concerning once it's out of beta though.

>>63924525
I've wondered if the lack of centerfire mostly printed guns is from actual critical failures or just peoples hesitation to make and or release them. The latest songbird version claims to handle them well with a compressible buffer behind the case head. I'm curious how well that works and if it could be adapted to a revolver. Blc has also been working on a centerfire revolver, but there hasn't been too much info on it in the last four years.

>>63924525
Plastic as is couldn't take it, even with pipe chambers, the top strap would break the first time you shot. Reinforced with metal plates and threaded rod, maybe.

>>63919676
>the frame itself is just a bunch of extra weight
Retard noguns. Try shooting a stocked pistols or pistol caliber carbine and then a regular pistol and report back. Stocked pistols have existed for a long time for good reasons.

>perfectly reasonable to have a Nerf gun at (place), but no real gun
Anywhere where you’re expecting Nerf guns you are also expecting kids to pick up those guns and shoot each other with them. The dumbest thing you could do is build a real gun that looks like a Nerf gun and take it there. Even if that gun lives in your bag, kids get in to stuff they shouldn’t and play with it all the time, that’s why we have poison control centers that know exactly what to do when someone ingests drain cleaner.

>>63920507
Unless it lives in your safe and only gets let out for short range trips you could reasonably be charged with something like:
Public endangerment
Child endangerment most likely
Child neglect if there are kids present with access to your gun (but that goes for any gun)
Depends on what you’re doing and if someone feels they need to call the cops on you and if kids are in the area.

>>63919616
Making your own guns has always been legal (at least in the US) as long as you can legally own a gun. Just because we have better tools it doesn’t mean that it’s illegal. If it was illegal then the very public websites that sell you kits to finish out your printed guns wouldn’t exist.

>>63927063
If a bunch of little thieves go through someones shit and end up shooting each other that's not a problem.

>>63927085
>Oh no! THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!
Fuck off.

>>63927874
The real concern is that the cops who jump at shadows and live every moment in fear for their saftey (the most important thing in our society, nay reality) will start to expect even brightly colored pieces of plastic to be lethal weapons in the hands of eight year olds. Getting cops to shoot less innocent people is something we should all be able to get behind, the courts won't do anything about it but we can refrain from making guns look like toys for upvotes. Those of us that aren't r*dditors anyway.

>>63920364
>.22
might as well be nerf at that point

>>63928094
I have to assume this is 100% sarcasm.

>>63928286
Yes because even a full auto spray of 20+ rounds of .22 won't kill you and noone in history has used .22 for execution shots, ever.

>>63928315
>full-auto printgun
enjoy your hand grenade

>>63928411
>move the goalpost

>>63919826
>>63919798
>>63919616
>IP
if you think you're being tracked based on IP rather than the unqiue hardware signature of your mainboard mac address and cpu backdoor: Lol, Lmao.

IP is old news and how low effort scammers get you. Glowy tracking is far more sophisticated and you're INSANE if you think you have any privacy at all on the internet anymore.

Whatever you do, do it knowing some fed may be watching in real time. That said, if you're not a on a bunch of federal bad goy watchlists you're not really living anyway. Fawning pro active compliance is for faggots, the other team operates fully in bad faith and are in fact the ones in violation of law, both in spirit and in letter. 2a is explicit and unequivocal, all the shit that goes on beneath it is what is illegal "Shall not be infringed" does not have an *after it saying "unless daddy government wants to"

>Th-they'll put you on the list!
Always was, don't care, glowniggers tongue my anus.

>>63928461
A director of the CIA once said their greatest weapon of all is the illusion of omniscience that surrounds them, largely woven by hollywood.

>>63928478
nsa does this stuff not cia
and its not like they ARE ALWAYS WATCHING
its the MIGHT BE watching at any time so the only safe assumption is that they are. Act as tho you are being surveilled if you have an electronic device of any sort in proximity. Alexa is listening, the question is if anyone is listening to alexa.

We know for example that hardware mics listen for marketing data, start mentioning product names near you smart TV, watch as ads for those products appear.
The corporations collect that data and feed it to llms to target marketing.

We also know all those big international media/marketing corps are entirely too cozy with the spooks and sell them data
Put 2 and 2 together anon what do you get?
you get a spiderweb of mics and cameras that the government has access to if it wants. The only question is, are you in particular imporant enough for anyone to be paying attention to and has the amount of available AI time yet become available to analyze the data on you that has assuredly been collected and archived in the huge fuckoff data centers the glows keep building out west.

Assuming you have privacy is how they catch you with your pants down anon, but it also means you have the option of staring into the camera while jerking off and making some glow nigger watch you bust a nut with eye contact.

>>63928522
People who don't have social media or "smart" devices are basically ghosts, you basically have to post direct evidence of a crime to facebook nowadays for authorities to catch you.

>>63924333
It would run afoul of some localities laws against zip guns, for example
>CA PC 17360(b) It was not originally designed to be a firearm

And a "reasonable person" would be expected to paint over the orange, but otherwise, most places it's probably a legal privately made firearm.