Stainless beretta or stainless Springfield 1911 in 9mm?
I'm a bit miffed that you have to buy stainless parts for the Beretta if you want it to look good since they cheaped out. Also, my other 1911 is a dinged up RIA (earthquakes) so it would be nice to have a nice one.

what's the decision? which one to buy to throw into the trash? seems like a waste.

>>63923334 (OP)
FAMAS

>>63923334 (OP)
>1911 in 9mm
get that German crap outta here

>>63923384
I want a nein, bro. My last 3 guns have been in expensive calibers.

>>63923334 (OP)
Langdon Beretta

>>63923427
glock.

>>63923334 (OP)
>1911
>9mm
>nice
wrong

>>63923501
Already have one in .45 plus I can get a .38 super barrel

>>63923427
45 isn't that expensive, but buy the pizza blaster if you want a 9mm.

>>63923700
It's expensive enough in California. I get to $5 everytime I buy ammo now starting today. Plus I'm essentially paying 20.5% or more in sales tax on ammo as well.

>>63923533
If you get a .38 super barrel for that 9 you should get a heavy spring to pair with it, it'll shoot that super ammo smoother.

>>63923334 (OP)
Beretta is better than 1911 in every regard except not coming in 45 acp or 10mm

>>63923334 (OP)
I really want a stainless 1911 too, but I'm hesitant to give Springfield my money. Ruger makes one that isn't that much more than the SA and S&W also have some nice looking ones but they're a few hundred above that.

>>63923767
If you're keeping grudges on manufacturers, then you'll find yourself with slim pickins.

>>63923844
Yeah, I know, but I just don't like SA in general, never been that impressed by their guns and it really rubs me wrong how their whole corporate identity is intentionally deceptive.