Can /k/ ever answer honestly?

>>63951189 (OP)
Beware, brown hands made this thread.

>>63951189 (OP)

>Beware, brown hands made this thread.

Diden't "NATO backed forces" just take controll in Syria after a week long offensive?

Damn, I so wish that the ukies were backed by NATO and not given just some tiny pittance from the old stocks. This would have been so absurdly kino to watch. Though a bit short.

>>63951201
so, an American?

>>63951201
Nice selfie

>>63951189 (OP)
Neither side can make significant gains without sustaining heinous losses. It's more strategically advantageous for the Ukrainians to allow the Russians to keep sending thousands of men to their deaths in exchange for empty fields and the occasional minor city.

>>63951221
Cool, they should do that on their own dine then.

>>63951227
I wholeheartedly support my tax dollars being used to wipe the Russian army off the face of the earth.

>>63951227
When America gives Ukraine back its nukes, helmettard.

When will russia do it without being backed by Iran, NK, China and the entirety of the global south?

>>63951227
>Cool, they should do that on their own dine then.
>SAAAR do not help the Ukraine SAAAAAAAR DO NOT REDEEM!!!
Stay out of Europe, shitskin!
And be thankful EVROPA has not awoken, we are exceedingly good at war, and our new increased NATO spending target alone amounts to about 10 aircraft carriers per year should we need them. You are walking on thin and increasingly paranoid ice with absurd industrial capacity.

>>63951227
Best use of my tax money in decades

>>63951210
>When NATO raises its brow, all will be made known

>>63951248
This but unironically.

>>63951246
>>63951250
Delusional. Meds now.

>>63951189 (OP)
>gets the economic and military table scraps
>this counts as fighting not only a NATO backed force but the whole of NATO
Where'd you go to get a bachelor's in stupid? Jupiter University has strict requirements

>>63951252
>the shitskin actually thinks Russia stands a chance against NATO
shiggydiggy

>>63951256
I know I know. It’s a gesture of goodwill to let Ukraine lose.

>>63951262
NATO is not fighting in Ukraine.

>>63951262
Ukraine is not in NATO. And Russia is the one losing everything for the empty villages, even with the current level of support. Your country is done for, both economically, politically, and demographically.
I for one fully support NATO entering the conflict, but it's not up to me. I wish to see you bombed to dust by stealth bombers, I want to see the seas erupt with ballistic missile launches, I want to see ziggers ground to dust under rocket artillery, I want to see a stormshadow entering the Kremlin, I want to you see you personally sent to the front. You dogs only understand the language of violence.
t. moderate

>>63951265
And there aren’t any norks on Russian side.