Whys there all this focus on rifles when war are always won by heavy equipment and not larpers?

>>63994784 (OP)
Boredom

>>63994784 (OP)
Because people can't buy howitzers or MBTs as easily as an AR you frogposting retard.

>>63994784 (OP)

>war are always won by heavy equipment and not larpers?

How about asking these chads?

>>63994805
I dunno anon, from what I remember reading about the taliban is that the main weapon for producing casulaties against the coaltion was
>IED + mortars
>RPG + recoiless rifles
>heavy machine guns + PK machine gun
>SVD's
>AK's and other rifles, mainly used for mass supression in support of other weapon. The only time the AK was deadly was in very close ambush situations and even in that case the PK was more devestating since it could mow down a whole squad in one belt (happend a few times to the afghan national police).

>>63994795
This. If I could reasonably own a 175mm howitzer so I could defend myself from New Yorkers before they arrive in my state I would.

>>63994795
You can't buy them but you can make them. But then you end up on a list.

>>63994889
Both the cannon and the shell would be considered DDs and you'd get reamed out for unlawful manufacture thereof.

>>63994784 (OP)
try winning a war with no rifles retard