Thread 64011120 - /k/ [Archived: 213 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/21/2025, 7:39:02 AM No.64011120
4E625594-B6EC-4E6E-9CAF-0A09D13D41EC
4E625594-B6EC-4E6E-9CAF-0A09D13D41EC
md5: 6bd4a50be3d7f83019f7f05effd3dfd0🔍
How would the final year of World War II have played out if that table leg hadn't been in the way? Like, I realize Germany had pretty much already lost the war by that point but how would it happen with Hitler dead and the country potentially fighting a civil war within its world war?
Replies: >>64011128 >>64011214 >>64011231 >>64011670
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 7:42:02 AM No.64011128
>>64011120 (OP)
Faster occupation by the Allies. They had already made clear unconditional surrender (because the Third Reich COULD NOT BE TRUSTED) was the only option and the USSR was going to take half of Germany regardless.
Replies: >>64011168 >>64011181 >>64011197
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 8:02:40 AM No.64011168
>>64011128
This. It wouldn't have gone much differently. Especially since the WAllies were already pushing through France. All the final pieces were on the board.

Had they iced dat nigga circa April 1944, things might've gone differently.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 8:12:26 AM No.64011181
Himmler on discord
Himmler on discord
md5: 79220a603ab27bb40969e44302eefcd3🔍
>>64011128
>They had already made clear unconditional surrender (because the Third Reich COULD NOT BE TRUSTED)

To be fair, they were also entertaining overtures by Himmler on and off going all the way back to 1940. I'm sure they could have been flexible on what was considered "unconditional" surrender if it meant ending the war with drastically fewer deaths

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn38TLpvRp0
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 8:24:38 AM No.64011197
>>64011128
this.
only believable change in my mind coulb be, that the german high command giving up the western front and trying to hold the tide against the east possibly leading to a faster cold war as the soviets would feel betrayed.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 8:36:33 AM No.64011214
>>64011120 (OP)
Weapons?

Also at that point the main difference would be much more Germans alive amd much more Germany intact at the end of 1945. Which is nothing to scoff at.
I also belive that Germany irself wouldn't be partitioned. But Soviets would still got Konigsberg and most of todays Poland.
Czechoslovakia might've become part of western sphere or might've become neutral like Austria.
Overall it's a pitty somebody kove that briefcase.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 8:49:45 AM No.64011226
1742432808221921
1742432808221921
md5: 9954f4e7848236d1ca3a8da680f29536🔍
all bizarre assassination circumstances are the result of time travelers trying to structurally prevent nuclear war
I firmly believe this despite a total lack of evidence
Replies: >>64011247
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 8:51:32 AM No.64011231
>>64011120 (OP)
It wasn't a table leg, it was Hitler's massive cock
Replies: >>64011980
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 9:02:31 AM No.64011247
>>64011226
>prevent nuclear war
Nani?!
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 1:22:00 PM No.64011670
>>64011120 (OP)
Some of these other comments are missing the mark by a bit. A full year off the end of the war would have greatly reduced the Soviet footprint in East Europe. There may not even have been an East Germany, especially since the Soviet army would never have made it to Berlin for the Great Raping and Looting. That would have been a huge loss of their stolen brain and industrial loot from Germany, plus the fact that Germany would have had so many more Germans alive and being productive krautisms

FDR would have been in much better health for whatever Yalta-equivalent negotiations that would have ensued, so Stalin would have got less than he did. The Soviets wouldn't have been positioned to occupy the Kurels, either. Japan would have fallen slightly faster with more resources available to pour into the Pacific theater. These are seriously significant factors that would have impacted containing the Soviets throughout the entire Cold War.

And, like it or not, there would have been at least one million (if not two) more Jews alive. That would also have impacted Jewish brain trust & wealth while slightly reducing some of the worst concentration camp horrors. The highly traumatic repercussions of the Holocaust stories & evidence would have had less influence over Western guilt ... if not in the first couple of decades than maybe not so strongly for so many decades. Not insignificant.

Overall, it would have made some huge differences. There is an entire tsunami of butterfly effects that would be virtually impossible to map out and determine with any certainty what today's world would look like. Changes in world political alliances alone can barely be imagined, NATO and the United Nations would be vastly different or maybe not even have happened at all in any form we see them today.
Replies: >>64011819
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 2:38:54 PM No.64011819
>>64011670
Interesting thought experiment(s). Also worth considering just how many Soviet lives that would have been saved. A large number of them would also have been Ukrainian. Major implications for the current Ukraine war.
Replies: >>64011897
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:27:09 PM No.64011897
>>64011819
Didn't the soviets suffer most casualties early war?
Replies: >>64011968
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:02:34 PM No.64011968
>>64011897
They had vastly more captured early in the war but their base battlefield casualties (KIA, WIA, MIA) were consistently abysmal throughout the whole conflict.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:08:02 PM No.64011980
>>64011231
So he transitioned?