>>64013662 (OP)
>CQB
Fiber optic sounds like a worse choice for trench/building clearing than wireless.
>USV with MANPADS
Not every country is retarded as Russia is to fly fighter jets within MANPADS range.
>Airfield attack
Legit impressive attack but it could have been prevented if Russia exercised the slightest bit of caution and set up a real security perimeter a several km radius around the base. Also took months to plan and prep.
>myanmar helicopter attack
drones do not have the speed or flight ceiling to attack most aircraft in a combat situation.
>BMP
Vehicle without APS, radar, (visible, could be wrong) jamming equipment, and RWS, acting unsupported. Armor will stay relevant as some modicum of protection for meatbags and as a platform for anti-drone equipment. The real redpill is that UGVs will replace manned AFVs in many if not most roles.
>missiles are a waste of money
>literally posts a guided cruise missile
giving it a different name doesn't change what it is.
>counter battery
useful but real artillery gives you a faster time on target unless a drone unit happens to be nearby.
>ATGMs
Same as artillery.
>SAM suppression
Would not have been possible if Russian SHORAD systems like Pantsir worked (they don't)
Aside from them not working, I bet there's Russians cursing themselves for losing so many in the early part of the war.
>You just drone the enemy generals and infastructure
Legitimately the greatest use case for FPVs and other light drones. Still, depending on the operational conditions such an attack could easily be less preferable than a traditional ballistic missile/cruise missile/aircraft strike or just not possible at all for any number of reasons.
>>64015558
>In two decades tops the US will either be balkanized due to Civil War 2™ or just another American Brown socialist mutt shithole(think Brazil, Argentina etc).
With China's demographic crisis I'd bet on the US' chances of averting that future or at least outlasting China.
