>suspiciously launches as a competitor begins to fail

>>64019431 (OP)
What makes this better than a dagger?

I like the Lone Wolf offering best rn anyway.

>>64019452
Basically the parts are not shit like a dagger.

>>64019452
modular frame, comes already milled for optics, comes with decent irons, actually will fit into every Glock holster unlike a Dagger and not made by meth monkeys

>>64019431 (OP)
>not calling it the RugPul

>>64019431 (OP)
We got a few of these in at my work and I got to shoot one. It's a lot nicer than a PSA dagger for basically the same price.

>>64019431 (OP)
Ruger could have won the M18 contract with this.
All the upsides of the Sig
Half the cost
Doesn't kill airmen

>>64019431 (OP)
>begins

>>64019505
Sig is selling the M18 with all of its accessories for just over $200. I really doubt Ruger could do half that.

>>64019431 (OP)
That angled cut on the slide looks so cheap and cheesy.

>>64019579
Too be fair, that's only because SIG overcharges a fuck ton for their civilian sales

>>64019431 (OP)
They should have left it with the original name

>>64019431 (OP)
>"the PSA dagger is le bad but the ruger RXM is le good"
>"no I won't actually prove why that is"
>
Ruger made the mistake of not offering a threaded barrel out of the box, even if it would have made it just a few dollars more. Seriously, the RXM's MSRP is $500 which I'm pretty sure is the same MSRP as the Glock 19 Gen 3 its a clone of

>>64019590
Glock got outglocked for once.

>>64019452
Since it's another modular FCU design, pretty soon we'll see chassis like the Flux Raider for this gun.

>>64019709
Glock needs to increase production of horse cum to subsidize firearms production

>>64019452
>What makes this better than a dagger?
Its not dagger

>>64019452
It has the whole serialized FCU where you can swap out the grip modules and uppers. I hope that Magpul makes a stocked version, I'll buy it to SBR.

>>64019659
>Ruger semiautomatics
>selling for MSRP

>>64019431 (OP)
im pretty sure Ruger is incapable of making an attractive looking semi-auto gun. They all look like cheap shite. I'm sure RXM is cool but i have no reason to get it when i can get a Glock, HK, etc.
>but it's modu-
i dont care.

>>64020089
Dealer price is ~350, that’s almost $100 in profit per RXM sold at msrp. I think it’ll be pretty easy to find them at $500, provided Ruger manages to convince dealers to shill the thing.

>>64019431 (OP)
I genuinely wonder if it is as reliable as say a gen 5 Glock, or as mechanically accurate. I know everyone has a ton of good will towards the RXM(including me I guess) but I'd love to see a long term durability test when they start becoming feasible. I know a few preliminary ones exist, but still. I wonder if the theoretical gen 6 "modular" Glocks are gonna be better than the RXM, I'm sure poorfags(imagine not being able to afford a Glock lmao) will already say the RXM is superior because they are brokies

>>64020247
It's probably not going to do a 100,000 round torture test like a Glock will, but will it go bang every time? Yeah. The design is solid.

>>64019463
>>64019723
What's the oppositemof sour grapes? That's what these posts are.

>>64019431 (OP)
>yet another polymer trigger safety striker fired slop gun
Wow only one of a billion how revolutionary

>>64020318
watching poors argue over who makes the least shitty gen 3 glock clone is like looking up reviews for box wine.

>>64020324
the thing that is revolutionary about the RXM is its an actual gen 5 glock

>>64020441
the only revolutionary thing about it is that it's cheaper than a glock (at least brand new)

>>64020214
There's plenty for $350ish-400 on gunwatcher and they're 450 at bi mart for a brick and mortar price.

Modular FCU is a meme.
You can't make it into a 26/etc
There are no grip options
Ruger won't ever sell the FCU alone

Seriously what is the purpose? To change the color? This reeks of Masada levels of optimism.

>>64019431 (OP)
Who is the competitor? You trying to say the RXM will replace the nig nauer for military?

>>64020634
To play adult barbie playhouse for men. Same as the p320

>>64020634
>You can't make it into a 2-
Currently coming soon on magpul site
>There are no grip o-
Icarus, mischief, magpul, Wilson, and sharpe bros are either made on (icarus and one sharpe) or in the process of making them

>ruger
>competitors with a company that actually gets contracts

>>64020634
Tbf it's a pretty easy win if they do it right but they won't.
>Sell the RXM cheaply for 2-3yrs
>Develop a competent raider competitor in the mean time
>Create a sub compact frame too, maybe an aluminum fullsize as well
>Release these when there's a decent amount of base models in the wild
>Only sell them as chassis/frames, only sell the FCU with the G19 sized base model

>>64019712
The widow Glock could assist with that, I'd pay quite a lot to see her take a horse cum shower.

>>64019659
It's similar but it has a FCU instead of a serialized lower

>>64019659
Ruger hasn't sold a mag fed semi auto pistol at MSRP since the Mk I

>>64020247
10/10 chance the Gen 6 FCU is literally thr RXM

>>64021623
I genuinely don't even know if Glocks follow a generation scheme anymore. We have optic rails and new frame/slide combos seemingly every year now.

And I seriously doubt Glock is gonna drop their whole scheme for a modular FCU.

>>64020182
Herro

>>64019431 (OP)
I just noticed that they did a very tasteful job on the slide cuts/serrations and it looks like a mid-2000s pistol compared to most modern offerings. With some of these aftermarket frames, or even just the black one instead of that weird bluish-gray, it's actually a pretty snazzy looking pistol.

>>64022655
eh

>>64022680
supposedly you can rit dye your stealth grey TM grip black. or just grab a black one for 40 bucks.https://magpul.com/firearm-accessories/grips/ruger-rxm.html

>>64022631
If the RXM sees any adoption they will

I'm a poorfag and I like mine. Probably won't keep it forever but I'm practicing with it and feeling myself shoot better.

>>64019431 (OP)
>is still a massive piece of shit that doesn't run
The PSA glock clones are shit. But superior to that trash.

>>64019431 (OP)
Can they take OEM glock mags and not die? Especially the larger cap ones?
I have been having problems with the magpul glock mags latley.

>>64019606
>casually drops the best lineup of handguns then fucks off
Based Ruger

>>64024457
Ruger has never been a player with LE/Mil sales though.
>>64024658
I think they have a problem with the slide stop or something if I recall.

>>64024666
A lot of clones/guns that take glock mags don't have anywhere for the overtravel ledges to index on, so if you put a longer mag in those guns you can literally destroy the gun

>>64024457
Official spokesmen for Ruger have stated before in interviews that they intended this gun for the civilian carry market, rather than aiming for mil/le contracts and its feature set seems to support that. For example, the RXM doesn't have ambidextrous controls which would have made it ineligible for the MHS contract.

>>64024658
I've exclusively used Glock OEM 17-round magazines in mine with no issue. What problems are the Magpul magazines giving you?

>>64024666
There is a ledge near the nose of the magazine that is a touch lower on the Magpul mags (the ones the RXM was designed around) than the OEM Glock ones which - if you apply upward pressure onto an OEM mag while firing - can bump the slide catch and induce premature slide lock. The only circumstance I could see that coming into play is if you happened to be shooting off a sandbag.

>>64024734
The magpul mags the slide isn't fully going back, it fully ejects the spent casing, but then locks up before traveling all the way back.
This was with a gen 5 g19, no issue with OEM or ETS mags.

>>64024755
If that happens consistently across every magpul magazine you have, I would just sell them to somebody and buy more OEM/ETS mags.

>>64024811
As it stand I only ever used them for range use, but it was one of my newer ones, can't remeber when I bought it. But I hadn't marked it with a number yet.
I have older magpul mags that I've never had issues with.

>>64024663
yeah theyre so best no one even bothers talking about them

>>64024820
Then it's likely just a single lemon rather than a fundamental incompatibility between the brand and your gun. Generally, Magpul Glock magazines work well as long as you're not dropping them into sand or using steel case (as the all polymer construction has less tolerance for increased friction, either from debris or a less lubricious case design), but they tend to have more issues than OEM mags regardless. If you can identify the magazine I'd disassemble it and check if the magazine body needs cleaning, otherwise send it back or toss it.

>>64019606
Man the SR9 has great ergos and aesthetics. I wish they'd kept the styling for the RXM.

>>64024755
>>64024811
I wouldn't trust ETS either. For Glock and it's clones only buy OEM.

>>64020371
fuckin kek

>>64020634
>You can't make it into a 26/etc
I mean it's around the corner...

>>64022680
>it's actually a pretty snazzy looking pistol.
Ruger seems to always do a pretty decent job with pistol slide designs, they tend to fuck it up on the grip though.

Magpul left to design the frame was a match made in heaven. With one notable exception of what was literally their very first product outside a magazine they have done nothing but fantastic design; comfy, aesthetic and ergonomic