>>64025447>>64026917The P-38L mogged both.
P-47 had shitty range performance and fuel economy, even the bloated N variant for Pacific duty which was just an attempt to enlarge the airframe to stuff more fuel into it
Although performance (top speed) wise the P-38L was getting outclassed in 1945 by newcomers like the H Mustang, M and N Thunderbolt, D.103 Hornet it was still a superior and by then well-integrated systems, tricycle landing gear multirole fighter with turbosupercharged twin engines which even the P-82 didn't have
The P-38 was a true predecessor to the jet fighter era in several key design aspects. And, it served the war effort (took a couple years of trial-&-error protracted development which paid off in the final variants to get there) from the outset of the U.S. involvement 1942 until the end, and the entire Allied war effort in both theaters over 1,800 airframes converted as F-4 and F-5 photo reconnaissance: a role for which it was most perfectly suited