>population of 1.5 billion
>largest military build up in history
>can currently build ships at over 100x rate to america
>is going to match America's nuclear arsenal by 2035
>claims they can destroy all of America's military assets in SE Asia within a month

Unironically, when the war starts, how do we win?

Maintain air and naval superiority and keep them at arms length. Pray no one's retarded enough to fire nukes.

Impressive.

With this most recent achievement, fate has in a single stroke, marked the final decline of the west and spelled a new era of wondrous prosperity and peaceful global dominance for the Chinese dragon, which promises to firmly stand in sharp contrast to the historically bloody ascent of western powers and the cruel subjugation it brought to the humbler nations of the world. With the blessings of Chinese quantum aircraft carriers and quantum enhanced railguns, these and many more will be the instruments with which China affirms its noble stewardship of 21st century world politics and with which it also offers the non-western world a different option; a humanist alternative to the depredations of Western leadership and the opportunity for a more equitable and dignified multilateralism.

Why are you so butthurt, chink?

>>64027583 (OP)
Lmao. China is a paper tiger there's literally nothing to worry about

>>64027586
How exactly can we do that?
>>64027590
?
>>64027598
Are you indian?

>>64027608
Then why do Russians consider China an extreme military threat?

>>64027609
>How exactly can we do that?
Ensure naval and air assets are kept up to date with modern equipment and training, standardise designs and used equipment for easier production and resupply, etc etc. Funny big man armchair general words can be 'correct' but the real answer is to win the air and naval wars.

>>64027618
>standardise
you spell that word like a brown person.

>>64027614
Dunno, probably has something to do with HIVans completely defanging their own military in their 3-day war.

>we
LMAO this chink fag thinks hes an American.

>>64027583 (OP)
I'd say the most thing with the most question marks around it is the average Chinese soldier's loyalty to the regime that they're serving. Something that is not widely known, if you think that the West has an incel problem, China has that but times 1000. There are so many young men there who simply do not believe that China is a country worth fighting for. I would expect great internal instability in China if there is a war, there would be protests or even riots. In the actual battlefield - desertions.

none of this matters because le gdp of china is bad and 50 chinks working in a factory making ammo only make as much as one wallstreet executive so it all matches

check mate

>>64027645
But doesn't China have the highest GDP in the solar system when you adjust for PPP?

>>64027641
the last time there was any type of demonstration in china it was 1989 and it was crushed

literally crushed.

>>64027647
doesn't matter because if you divide a bond stock by a derivative curve of 5000000 tech stocks to property prices then china loses [please ignore china adding the energy equivalent of Indonesia in power generation per month]

>>64027652
>please ignore china adding the energy equivalent of Indonesia in power generation per month
I thought they were adding one Russia worth of nuclear fusion capacity every week.

>>64027661
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/26/china-breaks-more-records-with-massive-build-up-of-wind-and-solar-power

>Between January and May, China added 198 GW of solar and 46 GW of wind, enough to generate as much electricity as Indonesia or Turkey

But ignore that because it doesn't yield le gdp and doesn't make house prices go up

>>64027621
I'm just retarded lmao

>>64027663
>But ignore that because it doesn't yield le gdp and doesn't make house prices go up
why would i ignore 45% of China's gdp?

>>64027583 (OP)
>MAJOR Weaknesses:
>The size of their economy
>The fact that they print money to build things they don't need endlessly because not hitting growth targets makes the CCP look weak
>People kept intentionally poor, despite GDP per capita going up, the average Chinese person is still dirt poor and has to massively go without
>Still, instead of spending the money on your people, you cover up the flaws and spend the money building up a massive military you can't afford to maintain
>have to hire an army of shills on the internet to pretend China is in fact strong and not weak like previously thought
China can fill the world's oceans with ships, but can China afford to fuel and maintain them all?

>>64027678
Because you're hurting the feelings of the Chinese people by not just buying his bullshit.

>>64027648
China's youth unemployment rate is catastrophic. China's Gen Z is purposely unemployed, and in all honesty it's not a bad idea. The Yuan is functionally scrip-tier currency. the CCP has just enough carrot to keep the economy moving, and in reality the military can't stop people from not working without implementing sweeping reforms and totalitarian measures in a time when the jobs just aren't there. China has to keep printing money to keep construction projects going while knocking down old buildings to build new ones.
There's a big demand problem for Chinese labor because automation has made tens of percentage points of labor reduction possible, and like everywhere else the rat race to the bottom is prevalent.
China can make its economy look good if they only print hundreds of trillions of yuan to meet ambitious quarterly growth targets, but in the long term this is unsustainable, and the average Chink has no idea, and the average Chinese economic planner knows they have no choice but to keep the top-heavy meat wagon rolling.

>>64027883
Even more important, can China enforce oceanic trade routes?

>>64027902
I think the more important question is 'How long can China afford growth for the sake of growth' and 'How much will a mothballed fleet of warships the PLAN can't afford to maintain be worth on the open market in the future?'

>>64027648
farlse nerws!

>>64027902
Even more important, can China afford to enforce oceanic trade routes?

>>64027583 (OP)
i've been hearing this for 20 years

These spam threads are so incredibly blatant.
OP might as well have a trip saying-
>TotallyRealAmericanMan

China is on the verge of collapse, no? They're facing massive unemployment, rampant corruption, and huge infrastructure problems where everything seems to be fake. If they go to war with anyone, they'll surely lose. Their only advantage is the terrain. If India were better at mountain fighting or actually decided to send a few divisions up there, Tibet would become Indian. Clock is ticking for China.

>>64028051
China can probably fake it as long as something major doesn't happen.

>>64027583 (OP)
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ally
Somehow I think the US alongside it's allies can outproduce a single country

>>64028071
If the collective west + Australia, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Brazil got together, every single thing China makes can be replaced in these countries, production rates will go up, countries within the sphere will be more prosperous, unemployment will go down, and China can be removed from the supply chain.
China doesn't have a monopoly on anything, and China's prosperity is just temporary.

China is just a larger 1990s Japan. They failed to continue to generate natural economic growth and now are printing money like mad without getting many benefits besides making the Communist party look competent.

implessive

>>64028110
China's fiction is hilarious. We have fucking missiles why would we try to launch fighter jets on something that close? It would have been fish food 50 miles before it closed on a CSG.

>>64028122
These kind of tyrannical systems don't have the smartest populations. Realism has no influence on them.

>>64027583 (OP)
>>largest military build up in history
Still in the 'self-defense' levels, even below the NATO min target of 2%.