>>64029766Exactly. My dad, and his dad before him were not exactly discerning consumers. My grandfather in particular was a heinous offender when it came to accumulating slop. Cheap, shitty knives. Cheap, shitty pistols in volumes well beyond anything worth preserving. My father isn't as bad, but he could get rid of 90% of his shit and focus in on the 10% remaining and it would be a net positive.
When an average middle or lower wealth class person passes away, it's genuinely unusual if they have more than one or two things worth keeping and preserving. The rest is just the detritus left over at the end of their life.
I'm more focused on making sure the things I buy will last and be worth keeping than anyone in the last 2-3 generations of my family were and even then I know the things that matter will fit on a single page of will at the end. Things which I specifically intended and went out of my way to ensure would be of a quality and timeless value worth preserving.
Keeping something that wasn't special when it was made, or to the person who brought it bought it, and has no special or redeeming qualities still around just because it's old is worse than being a consumer. It's anchoring yourself to generations of garbage that will get in the way of you ever building something meaningful and actually worth preserving for future generations.