Are Americans trying to cope with losing to a pile of dirt in Iran?

>https://www.sandboxx.us/news/air-force-wants-to-replace-the-worlds-stronger-bunker-buster-with-an-even-stronger-one/

>nooo you can't just create more powerful weapons nooooo!
lol
lmao

>>64029802
Kys zigger vassal state shill, america gets bombed on a daily basis

>>64029947
what a weird response. what even prompts this?

Weight: ~25,000–30,000 lb
Length: ~21–23 ft
Diameter: ~31 in
Compatible Platforms: B-2, B-21 Raider, B-52 (with pylon upgrades)

Precursor Charge: High-velocity kinetic slug (depleted uranium tipped) breaks outer defence layers.

Main Warhead: Ultra dense, forged tungsten-core penetrator with active bore-shaping tip.

Tri-mode guidance, so GPS/INS primary with TERCOM mid course direction and laser/TAR terminal correction.

AI fusing systems to combine real time mapping of terrain factors. So geological sensing with ground-penetrating radar and inertial shock sensors to make sure you hit the right bit. Additionally have it have 'void detection' to make sure it explodes in the right area or have 'structure targeting' so it realises it is inside support beams etc to explode.

Modular warhead, so penetrator only for deep impact, thermobaric follow through and even (if it works out) EMP microburst shit (CHAMP HiPER and HPM warheads are in development)

Instal embedded micro sensors for post-detonation feedback to transmit impact depth, detonation success and acoustic readings.

After that we're entering into 'theoretical and possibly but probably not viable' territory like pre-launched robot drills that pre-drill into terrain so the bomb itself can go further, direct energy assist strikes and neural link fire control.

>>64029754 (OP)
show working centrifuge

>>64029754 (OP)
>Build weapon to do X
>Get a chance to have it actually do X
>It doesn't perform quite as well as you'd like
>Build an improved version to do X better based on your real world experiances
Wouldn't the cope be to refuse to admit there was room for improvement?

>>64029754 (OP)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_shaped_charge
A 1kt nuclear-shaped charge with tungsten liner could:

Penetrate 50–150 meters into rock.

Punch through 3–10+ meters of steel or superhardened target.

Deliver an ultrasonic jet or EFP at several km/s, creating a tunnel or superheated penetration cone.

It’s a theoretical device—but very plausible. Not your grandpa's nuke. If you'd like schematics or to explore a fictional application (like drilling into a megastructure or opening a tunnel in an asteroid), I can build that next.