Thread 64032825 - /k/ [Archived: 37 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/26/2025, 3:27:24 PM No.64032825
1736115007164758
1736115007164758
md5: 0a4d8de7cc557eb05f8148aa9103ed51🔍
>The crews from the 1st ABCT, 1st Armored Division showcase their lethality during live-fire testing of the M134 Minigun, mounted on an M1A2 SEPv2 Abrams tank, July 2025.
>In this example, the M134 Minigun is mounted on the loader's skate rail in place of the M240 GPMG.
Based and Modern Warfare 3-pilled
https://x.com/ronkainen7k15/status/1948933162744041700?s=19
Replies: >>64032830 >>64032903 >>64032994 >>64034102 >>64034966
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 3:30:18 PM No.64032830
>>64032825 (OP)
>we may see a future where all tanks carry miniguns to deal with drones
Perhaps I was too hard on them, drones can create cool things
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 3:58:08 PM No.64032895
Very cool, but god damn that's expensive.
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 4:03:14 PM No.64032903
>>64032825 (OP)
All they need now is a radar + aiming system
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 4:32:15 PM No.64032994
>>64032825 (OP)
19K seems like a comfy MOS. Sometimes regret not picking it/Army.
Replies: >>64034949
Anonymous
7/26/2025, 9:03:04 PM No.64034102
>>64032825 (OP)
like in cod mw3
Anonymous
7/27/2025, 12:27:50 AM No.64034949
>>64032994
It's one of the filthiest jobs in the military. Tankers are gross people.

t. Infantry
Anonymous
7/27/2025, 12:31:19 AM No.64034966
>>64032825 (OP)
It’s not a new concept, but there are reasons to why it’s been held off. It requires loads of ammunitions to be stored on the tank because of how much shit it consumes. Too expensive and drones are probably a better option than a minigun placement.