I haven’t seen a combat video with a tank or other armored vehicle in a long time. Now it’s all just scooters and four wheelers.

It's around

>>64033959 (OP)
Functionally extinct, both for this war and for the autists doing OSINT (Covert Cabal should switch to the broader supply chain or north korea).
I'm still waiting for monke to announce the T-24 that is just a new T-90 like tank instead of a armata 2.0

>>64033959 (OP)
They're largely gone because the Russian's designed them to explode upon impact. Just a few days ago, there was an article that discussed satellite photos revealing that the T-80s have now officially become extinct and the next in line for extinction are the T-72s

>>64033963
an armata*

>>64033959 (OP)
They do still occasionally make armored assaults.
But it's only the "elite" units that get assigned such vehicles, such units tend to scrape together about a dozen armored vehicles to make monthly suicide assaults which inevitably end up getting destroyed.
It seems russia still has a somewhat significant number of armored vehicles but most of them (especially the "new" production ones) seem to be used primarily for training and internal policing.

https://files.catbox.moe/vtgm30.mp4

I seen two videos today where they had armor. It didn't go well.

>>64033962
Literally

Any exciting things or inflection points in the past six months other than Spiderweb?

>>64033985
>2 of them just leave without doing anything
huh?

>>64034085
>Ukraine is hitting more research facilitiies and production plants
>Sochi just mauled
>Except for a few outliers, Soviet Era stockpiles are now said to be nothing more than scrap metal tier

There are literally new videos of armor dropping off troops in Pokrovsk every single day

>>64034094
This. The latest videos have all the BMPs looking like hedgehogs covered in spikes and extra plates. It took AFU over 60 drones to take out one of them

>>64034093
Appreciate the answer but that seems like "no". Scattered backline bombardment, grinding attrition, strikes on uke cities.

>>64033965
>satellite photos revealing that the T-80s have now officially become extinct and the next in line for extinction are the T-72s

No more T-80 in storage =/= extinct. According to recent losses data, T-80 is now the most used tank on the russian side, with T-72 being close to extinct.

>>64033965
>Just a few days ago, there was an article that discussed satellite photos revealing that the T-80s have now officially become extinct
Link?

>>64034106
Vid?

>>64034094
>Pokrovsk
I thought that place fell to Russia like a dozen times?

>>64033959 (OP)
Escaped to the one place that hasn't been corrupted by capitalism!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1Sq1Nr58hM&ab_channel=geoffEXE

>>64034106
>It took AFU over 60 drones to take out one of them
That sounds fun, got the video to show this? The turtle tanks took less than that.

>>64033963
>>64033959 (OP)
>North Korea

A year or so ago they were talking about making the infantry support core of their armored forces 800 T-62Ms until they could build more modern stuff in numbers. If true that makes sense as that is the only way they could get enough hulls to recoup their losses that quickly.

>2025: The world's second most powerful army plans to rearm with second hand early generation Chomahos

You are here.

>What happened to all of Russia’s armor?
That's a trasnphobic question

>>64035029
Apparently they are throwing everything they got at it, there was an article at CNN citing 110,000 troops, this is a tenth of Russia's army, I guess there is where their armored production is going, personally my guess is unless ukkies do something novel or pidors fuck it up AFU will eventually evacuate it. It will still cost a lot of russian lived to complete an encirclement, which explains why Monke is increasing recruitment quotas.