>>64056975IMO the history of the Congo is fascinating and I find it sad people basically start with Belgian colonisation in the 1870's as if nothing had happened beforehand.
Which is weird because when you read about it you read about Livingstone then Stanley exploring and mapping the place, which implies that it's a wild region populated by a low density of small communities.
What makes it weirder is that you'll probably read about the great Kingdom of Kongo that started in the late 14th century, so you'll wonder why the Congo basin was considered wilderness and why the kingdom was basically gone by the time Belgians went there.
In short, the Kongo kingdom was centered on the coast and was very powerful, they basically waged war against neighboring countries already NG the coast or went on slave catching raids into the continent. This centralised manpower in the capital and emptied the nearby regions of people, which was exactly what the Kongo kingdom wanted. When the Portugese arrived the King started to export his slave workforce, reinvested the surplus into better weapons and captured many more slaves. He basically emptied the whole region of it's workers, and over the long term the region stagnated economically into the wilderness the famous explorers discovered in the late 19th century.