>>64056702>Dimensions aren't the only thing that matter.Of course, the first and most important aspect of a carry handgun is safety, which is why the p365 is disqualified from the start. Then it's reliability - neither Springfield nor M&P are known to have any issues in that department, Kimbers on the other hand have a reputation for jams. I'd say capacity to size ratio is the next important factor, given it's an objective metric. Subjective metrics such as trigger/grip "feel" are subjective and therefore not particularly relevant, especially for experienced shooters that realize "feel" is that last thing that matters for effectiveness and typically an amateurish excuse for insufficent training with a particular firearm.
> If size to capacity is all that matters, go get that weird ass Kel-Tec 5.7You'd have a point if the PR57 was a microcompact, but unfortunately it is not. 5.7 is not a bad cartridge, so it would be a strong contender if they managed to scale it down, but then Kel-Tec is notorious for relaibility issues.