>learnt nothing from Iraq

MRAPs are still in use, they're just too big and heavy for some roles. The ISV can fit in the back of a chinook for example, you're never getting a JLTV in there even with the wheels off.

>this thread again

>>64063677 (OP)
uhuh

>>64063695
just wait for the hill billy armor when donny invades Iran

>>64063677 (OP)
Oh boy, if only that wasn't the US Army's only type of vehicle! Wait, what's that say? We have 19,000 JLTVs in service and that OP is retard? Surely not!

OP doesn't even have to say what he is referring to yet you all automatically think he is talking about armor

>>64063677 (OP)
It's another "every vehicle is a frontline vehicle" thread.

>>64064214
no doubt that was the explanation for Hummers in Iraq, only for them to have to get hillbilly armor
other militaries are able to do greater specialisation with intermediate and medium weight, they have heavy motorised/light mechanised in 4x4/6x6 MRAP trucks and LAV APCs, in between light and armored forces
the US Army was reluctant to get MRAP trucks in Iraq despite pick related and had to be dragged kicking and screaming to use the Stryker (which has now been whittled down to just 6 active duty brigades)

>>64063677 (OP)
>a non piss poor nation can... they can use different vehicles for different roles????
Kill yourself shitskin

>>64063677 (OP)
I'm looking forward to being able to buy one of these on the government auction sites in 20 years you shut your whore mouth

>>64063794
Shame they're getting phased out

>>64063677 (OP)
Man cannot stray away from the truth forever.

>>64064214
It's a military murphy's law: any vehicle available will be used as a frontline vehicle

>>64064214
The ISV is actually intended as a front line vehicle. Soldiers' combat loads have been unreasonably high for decades and they've grown even more recently. The idea of the ISV is that soldiers can dump all of their sustainment gear and some spare ammo and shit on it to keep them mobile.

It's the AI controlled robot pack mule, except it's human controlled and has wheels instead of legs because those things actually work.

>>64063677 (OP)
Learn what? These are made for conventional warfare, not peacekeeping.

>>64063794
Nice MRAP, you don't need 19,000 of them though. Send them to Ukraine.

>>64066365
No I don't think I will

>>64066365
what kind of argument is this

>>64066365
>Send them to Ukraine
They don't need 19,000 of them, better to send them some tomahawks and see russians died in deep of their country

>>64065934
stuck in the back, or exposed in the front? the choice is yours!

>>64066049
They're not. They're just not buying newer ones.

>>64066378
It's called a false-flag troll to get (you)s much like how this thread is a slide thread to shit on the US military. Probably made by the same people who make the very implessive threads about the wonders of the chinese PLA.