I suppose you need more?

>>64098227 (OP)
Yes.

Less, actually

>>64098227 (OP)
>No light, no optic, no 30 round mag, no lam, no supressor.

Yes, yes I do.

>>64098227 (OP)
No.

>>64098241
>m16 at home
no thanks

>>64098241
>great value chink clone
everytime

>>64098338
BASED.
Retro optics are the way to go with A1s.

Yes, I do. A1 masterrace.

>>64098227 (OP)
>not a 10.5 psa ar
NGMI

>>64098227 (OP)
>20 round mag
>5.56

A1 Master race!

>>64098578
sweet

>>64098227 (OP)
This type of OP post should be a permanent ban and range ban

>>64098227 (OP)
I need to fuck
ya mudda

>>64098661
That particular example was cuck'd to prevent select fire

>>64099605
I don't think you know the story behind that picture, anon.

>>64099926
I'm aware, he over penned a wall and killed a 14yo gril
Has nothing to do with select fire however

>>64098227 (OP)
nah bro I need less. You got way too much, there.

>>64100090
>flat top
sorry too much

>>64098661
why would he put an acog is he a sniper

>>64098227 (OP)
Nope, I have that exact rifle

I only need a little bit more, A1 is my beloved.

>>64098227 (OP)
Not a fan of the 3 prong.
>>64098607
Based.

>>64101345
Dated SWAT weapons end up in ordinary patrol units instead

>>64098227 (OP)
>Giant fuckheavy fuddslop
Just get an 11.5 PSA AR it's the same thing but better

>>64103091
You and your 11.5 PSA AR. I see you in every thread lately with that head scratching pepe. What is it about that gun thats so good?

>>64103140
It's a min/max thing. Compact, cheap, lightweight, but it is going to have shitty ballistics since 5.56mm is optimized for longer barrels.

I built a budget 9" 300blk braced pistol, which is a pretty good solution but the ammunition is much more expensive unless you reload. It is possible to argue in circles for eternity about which AR setup is best, so frogspammer isn't exactly wrong but I'll take my 20" A1 clone over an 11.5" for most applications.

das rite

>>64103158
Barrel length doesn't matter it's the same ammo

>>64103457
barrel length gives you more range

Do 20 rd or 30 rd mags look better in a M16A1?

>>64101422
Duck bill is cringe but strong bill >>64103290
is peak

>>64098227 (OP)
Yes, because your pic is incomplete

>>64098227 (OP)
for me its mixing elements from the a1 and a2 together

>>64103457
It matters a lot, especially with 5.56 which is designed around a 20". More complete powder burn, less muzzle flash, higher velocity, more range at which the projectiles fragment reliably, longer accurate range overall.

You can get some acceptable performance out of an 11.5" with boutique ammunition, but you are going to be paying a fortune for it. Running that with standard M855 or M193 is going to result in a lot of random ice picking beyond about 100yd. Of course that limited range can be worth it for for the shorter/lighter rifle as long as you are only going to be fighting within short range anyway, but that does gimp you a bit if you need to reach a little further.

>>64103573
Based and Harrell pilled

>>64103574
NTA, but to add on to what you said, even boutique ammo, while performing decently in 11.5" ARs, performs even better in a 20" AR. Plus, you can make a 20" rifle penetrate certain body armor based on what ammo you choose but an 11.5" carbine won't be able to penetrate that same body armor no matter what ammo it uses.

>>64103501
20s for sure, I don't know why but 30s just look wrong.

>>64103573
I agree, my original plan was basically your rifle, pencil barrel a1/c7 upper with A2 furniture, black anodized receiver, but when I actually had it all together it looked odd so I went period correct. It wasn't vibing with me

>>64103925
>20s for sure, I don't know why but 30s just look wrong.
Thx for the input. I always thought that 30 rd mags looked a bit bulky in an A1 while 20 rd mags looked too small in an A2.

>>64098257
Last time you actually needed any of that?

>>64103508
But 602 or 603?

>>64098227 (OP)
>>64098241
>Yes

>>64103574
77gr isnt boutique ammunition and 55gr will still fragment out of an 11.5" within home defense distances
shockingly bad take from you

>>64106780
I'm not wrong though.

77gr is a lot more expensive than 55 or 62gr, and while HD range could be 5-25yd where M193 would be fine, it stands to reason that if you want it to be a rifle that can do rifle things beyond just HD distance then you would want it to be effective beyond just 100yd. If the AR is strictly for HD that's one thing, but if it is supposed to do everything you may want an AR to do you'll probably need a longer barrel than 11.5".

Just a fixed 4x optic
>anyone who disagrees is a consoomer faggot hoping to spend their depression away

>>64103573
>neck welding to use the acog

>>64098227 (OP)
As a military veteran, I can say with authority that no civilian should own an AR-15. Get AK-47s instead. Most of our defeats have been at the hands of enemies armed with AKs.

>>64109761
acog was originally designed to be mounted on the carrying handle

>>64098227 (OP)
needs an optic, even a cheap shitty red dot is better than irons

>>64098578
Old aimpoints are sweet

>>64103620
Paul was autistic and didn't like optics

>>64110099
That's because they couldn't get ARs, not because AKs are better.

>>64111843
Also the situation is an exact 180 for the average American. ARs, AR parts, ammo, etc. are common as shit. AKs are relatively rarer.