← Home ← Back to /k/

Thread 64211908

33 posts 12 images /k/
Anonymous No.64211908 [Report] >>64211913 >>64211915 >>64211929 >>64211949 >>64211962 >>64211976 >>64211999 >>64212035 >>64212064 >>64212344 >>64212357
How did the US fall behind in drone technology?
Anonymous No.64211911 [Report]
Implessive
Anonymous No.64211913 [Report]
>>64211908 (OP)
Our ones actually fly,
https://youtu.be/zmUrEP0ET6w
Anduril's one is testing sometime this month.
Anonymous No.64211915 [Report]
>>64211908 (OP)
>posts temu us drones at home
kek
Anonymous No.64211922 [Report] >>64211927
We've been landing our ones on carriers for 12 years
Anonymous No.64211927 [Report]
>>64211922
forgot picrel
Anonymous No.64211929 [Report]
>>64211908 (OP)
>China demonstrating that they've finally developed the technology to copy the Global Hawk (but not really, which is why they aren't flying)
>US demonstrating that it's not actually impossible for a first world country to build shitty temu drones
Anonymous No.64211948 [Report]
it's joever
Anonymous No.64211949 [Report] >>64211971
>>64211908 (OP)
>Develop technology
>Old brass refuse to let "pilots die" never figure out what to use it for
>Years pass and old brass retire
>Other countries catch up
>Oh shit wtf were we doing
Pretty this is pretty much the state if US MIC with every project that the US had some prototype in the 00's. We either didn't know what the fuck were doing, didn't know what the fuck we want, or didn't know how the future wars were going to be fought cause we had GWOT up in our face. Same shit with the new Army rifle trying to fight the previous war. It's dogshit.
Anonymous No.64211953 [Report] >>64211958
>2025
>I am forgotten by chinkshills
Anonymous No.64211958 [Report] >>64211961 >>64212378
>>64211953
Didn't the Houthis shoot down 20+ of them during Operation Prosperity Guardian?
Anonymous No.64211961 [Report]
>>64211958
Yes, you think the Chinese drones are any different? We've been flying these things since 2006 bud.
Anonymous No.64211962 [Report] >>64211981 >>64212227
>>64211908 (OP)
No brains in USA.
Anonymous No.64211971 [Report] >>64211978
>>64211949
The difference is you can just open a binder and resume a program that has undergone a full spectrum of tests and fit it to a now known mission set as opposed to scrambling and throwing R&D money at a brand new thing.
Anonymous No.64211976 [Report] >>64211990
>>64211908 (OP)
Every one of those Chinese drones is a copy or attempt to catch up to an American UCAV that already exists or is in service.
Anonymous No.64211978 [Report] >>64212007
>>64211971
Actually you can't because engineers get fired and move on, contractors go out of business, and the technology itself becomes outdated.
You need to strike while the iron is hot.
Anonymous No.64211981 [Report]
>>64211962
Learn grammar chinkshill, also planes crash, get over it. 1200 F-35s and counting in service and the safest record of all time.
Anonymous No.64211990 [Report] >>64212065
>>64211976
Which one did they copy for this one? It has all moving wingtips and no tail. So which one did they copy?
Anonymous No.64211999 [Report] >>64212014
>>64211908 (OP)
Because America isn't in the game of 300 meter engagement anymore, they're more a 1500 meter engagement with their M7s. That's about the same range of a 50lb man portable drone disruptor.
Anonymous No.64212007 [Report]
>>64211978
Cope, this isn't some NASA scatterbrain program. Boeing restarted harpoon production in the 2020s using designs from the 70s, LM and NG did the same for Hellfires and AMRAAMS, so we're block 72 F-16s.
Anonymous No.64212014 [Report] >>64212024 >>64212032
>>64211999
>Doesn't know that fiber optics drones can fit targets to to 20-50km away by using Chinese fiber optic spools
Anonymous No.64212024 [Report]
>>64212014
Why Chinese specifically? The Ukies have been using them for years atp. It's not some groundbreaking thing.
Anonymous No.64212032 [Report]
>>64212014
>he doesn't know about drone internals getting fried
>he forgot that air superiority would render all drone capability useless
>he thinks a drone can hit an ac130
Anonymous No.64212035 [Report]
>>64211908 (OP)
>Chinks finally managed to copy early 2000 US drone tech
KEK
Anonymous No.64212064 [Report] >>64212092
>>64211908 (OP)
There's too much overlap with civilian drones for grenade-droppers and small FPV drones to be sufficiently patentable and profitable.
Unless a contractor can deliver a gold-plated premium exclusive, it's not's worth it.
Anonymous No.64212065 [Report] >>64212339
>>64211990
Anonymous No.64212092 [Report]
>>64212064
What will happen is the US will 3D print the bodies and contract out the motor, chips etc.
Anonymous No.64212227 [Report]
>>64211962
changs army currently stands at
killing chinese to establish maoism
killing chinese for cultural revolution
killing sparrows to kill chinese
losing to vietnamese communists
being cucked by smaller taiwan (real china)
and losing to niggers in africa while serving the great satan of UN
Anonymous No.64212339 [Report]
>>64212065
A cgi render again?
Anonymous No.64212344 [Report]
>>64211908 (OP)
You're so ass blasted filthy chink shill
Anonymous No.64212357 [Report] >>64212369
>>64211908 (OP)
a LOT of people are just making fun of this nerfed American parade nobody really wanted. I guarantee you Chinas parade cost like 10 billion minimum. If we spent 10B on just showing off tanks we would have had literal riots.
Anonymous No.64212369 [Report]
>>64212357
This, we haven't had a parade since the turn of the century. Last proper one was after the Gulf War. No one need parades when half the voter base wants distance the military from the American people as much as possible.
Anonymous No.64212378 [Report]
>>64211958
>Didn't the Houthis shoot down 20+ of them during Operation Prosperity Guardian?
Most estimates put them at ~14-17, only the Houthis themselves say 20+.