Thread 64216188

Which one of these makes the kinoest aircraft?

>>64216188 (OP)
LMT because I'm a shareholder

HAL IAI

Sharing the lead

>>64216244
Poo in the loo saar

>>64216188 (OP)
Are you really asking strangers to tell you what to think?
>inb4 many such cases

>>64216252
Cope harder Muslim

>>64216244
>>64216244

>>64216244

>>64216311
Purpose built, truly genius.

>>64216323
Of all the colours and camo patterns you could put on a plane... really? Pixel blobs of poo brown?

>>64216365
It blends in with the indian battlespace

>>64216188 (OP)
Grumman Corsair
You'll never beat a gull-winged fighter for kino

>>64216244

>>64216365
It is designed to blend into the landscape from above. Waters of India are natural brown, roofs often green from british copper roof style, and grey like the streets.

>>64216188 (OP)
I have a soft spot for the Dassault Falcon 900. It was the first airframe my father was certified to work on professionally so I saw so much of them up close when I was a kid.

>>64216449
Why the fuck are you even putting VVR into deciding a paint scheme in this day and age? That's like 50s era doctrine.

>>64216499
India

>>64216244
>>64216499
Cope mudslime, India's 6th gen will change the game forever. We're going to be at the top of the ticket sending your ass back to jihad. India and the west FOREVER. We will repopulate the world with Aryans once you're gone.

>>64216550
>India and the west FOREVER
Why is this jeet trying to sneak in

>>64216188 (OP)
Love for Israel still, when they win their war hopefully they can make gen 6.

>>64216572
You need us and we are clean and peaceful people. We will not steal from you like the Chinese did. We will not do terrorism like Muslim. We are not like uneducated and noisy like blacks. We are good obedient people.

>>64216610
>>64216244
Pic

>>64216244
Israel has the most woman pilots! One day I will marry one or two

>>64216188 (OP)
Mitsubishi

>>64216188 (OP)
>/pol/itical conditioning has made /k/ to the point of worshipping military industrial complex
And they say /k/ is fine

>>64216721
This anon saw the logos, half of which aren't American, and immediately ignored the question about aircraft.

>>64216731
>MIC, American
:(
>MIC, foreign
:o

>>64216188 (OP)
The answer is and always will be Etrich and their licensed builder of Albatros, Aviatik, DFW, Gotha, Harlan, Halberstadt, Jeannin, Kondor, RFG, Roland and Rumpler.

Ironically, its designer, Igo Etrich, did not want his creation to be used in was beyond spotting and training, but this type also served as a bomber and a very early fighter in some cases where the pilot would shoot at the enemy observation aircraft, usually with a revolver.

Igo Etrich designed all of his aircraft with the wing in picrel and it is based off of the wings of a dove (hence the name of this aircraft being Taube, the German for dove) and a lot of the aforementioned German and Austro-Hungarian companies use modified versions of Etrich's wing, usually for the sake of simplified construction, hence, more square. The exception is Fokker (of which Anthony Fokker developed a similar aircraft, the Spin, or Spider, having thought that his finished aircraft looked like it was donning a giant spider's web), Junkers (which was the Blohn und Voss of WWI in that they used corrugated metal construction) and Zeppelin (which focused on larger bombers only).

Sorry for the sperg out, but I have been waiting to talk about this for a little while, now.

>>64216710
>Twitter incel doesn't want our sexual prowess released on his women

What's new? He's used to competing with muslims, he's just going to have to get some style and attitude to keep up with us.

>>64216778
Since I mentioned the Fokker Spin, it too is a runner up for this title of the most kino aircraft, but the Spin is not nearly as influential overall, yet it is very important in Aviation history.

It was a contemporary aircraft to the Taube and it too used cues from birds in its design, though as I said before it was named Spin, the Dutch for spider, due to its extensive amount of rigging.

For a pre-WWI aircraft, it is something of a success story in that, Anthony Fokker only intended to produce one for himself, so he could have a stable platform on which he could teach himself to fly on, but after flying on 1 September 1911 (picrel) the German Army had taken notice and offered 300000 Marks and ten Daimler trucks so Fokker could organize the production of ten aircraft for what would be the first German military aircraft training program.

In all, twenty five Spins were built, the last one being completed by the company in 1936, being dedicated to Anthony and his flight which had started the company, some 25 years earlier. Unfortunately, Anthony was chronically ill then and he died in New York on 23 December 1939. He was 49.

By the way, not too many people know this, but Fokker is technically Indonesian by birth and Dutch by heritage.

>>64216778
>>64216830
Oh, since I seemingly have avoided your question, I am partial to Dassault, but really Dassault and MiG are closer than you might think. They (Marcel Bloch, later Dassault, Artyom Mikoyan and Mikhail Guevich) were in the same class at the Breguet School for aeronautical engineering and there are some common traits between the MB 150 and Mig-1.

Also neither LM or NG returned has gotten back to me for internship applications so I am not going to pass judgement for now, other than I like what they design.

>>64216780
good luck

>>64216887
Also, my first choice among modern companies was EADS Defense, but since that was not in your image, I could not say it.

>>64216778
>>64216830
It's nice to see other enjoyers of vintage Central Powers aviation kino.

>>64216910
It is hard to name aircraft that are more soulful, by design, often, it was one guy who taught himself how to design or fly an aircraft who then drew up the plans for the fighters and observation aircraft to be used in combat.

Now if only Albatros made a D series monoplane, now that would have been pure sexo.

Also, an FF-33 for (you).

>>64216910
>Ufag

>>64216279
Hello saar.

>LM
soulless slop
>Sukhoi
soulful slop
>SAAB
soulful mediocrity
>Dassault
soulful, but its reputation was ruined by selling to poos
>Mig
soulful but outdated
>NG
airframes that define geopolitics and aircraft as an art for decades

>>64218262
I am afraid you are correct anon

>>64216981
No arguments here, Igo Etrich was based. What do you think of Lloyd aircraft? They bear a resemblance to the Taube.

>>64216188 (OP)
northrop grumman

In this house we believe in Lockheed Martin supremacy.

>>64216188 (OP)
It's SAAB

locksneed shartin

>>64216778
>>64216830
first couple of decades of heavier than air flight and the early jet age are such insane periods

>>64216195
now considered part of the Swedish cultural canon

>>64219405
Early Lockheed was absolutely based. The P-38 was phenomenal, especially if you compare it to other planes that made their first flight in early 1939.

>>64216188 (OP)
I masturbate to the Viggen at least once a week

>>64216188 (OP)
Northrop, of course

>>64219318
Lloyd aircraft were developments of DFW aircraft, a license builder of the Taube. DFW and Lloyd types share commonalities in the wing, which is a development of the Taube wing with a shorter chord and swept leading edge.

Lloyd was one of the better Austro-Hungarian aircraft manufacturers known for having stable aircraft. Before you ask about the worst, it was Lohner and their rather unfortunate Type AA fighter project.
>>64219495
They truly were, the developments of those periods is something to behold. For example, in the span of a year, the US went from the F-86 to having the first F-101s (or rather, the XF-88). WWI aircraft development was even more rapid than that. Unfortunately, not as many people seem to care compared to WWII and later types.

>>64220207
Orville Wright grew up knowing horse-drawn carriages are the best method of transportation and died a few months after Chuck Yeager broke the sound barrier.

True French Beauty

>>64216188 (OP)
Grumman/Northrop Grumman. Unlike every other designer, they've never put a bad plane into service since the start of WWII, with every one of them being excellent or at worst mediocre. Their contributions to and expertise in carrier-based aviation also cannot be matched by any other manufacturer.
LM is good but it's not like they haven't had their own failures, and the F-104 bribery scandal and other incidents weigh heavily on them.
Sukhoi hasn't made anything other than Flanker upgrades since the fall of the USSR and they are surprisingly lacking in pedigree because of the way the Soviets distributed development work among design bureaus rather than letting them go nuts. Same goes for Mikoyan.
>>64216610
>sociopathy, in-group bias, and subversion of Jews
>theft and disregard for life of Chinese
>rape and inability to assimilate of Muslims
>IQ of blacks
>stench and filth unmatched
Every race has one or more positive contributions they can bring to the world. Copy at least one of them instead of everything wrong with all of them.

>>64221415
>by your powers combined, I am Captain India!

>>64216891
I get the duck lips, but does he have to chew the cud too?

>>64221927
He is doing the sacred cow impression.

>>64216188 (OP)
Convair

>>64222502
Reminder: This plane cost like 4 times more than the Manhattan project, and it only ever resulted in near disasters at a nuclear level, and it was retired after like 12 years of service. It's the M14 of planes. Looks cool, but actually sucks huge dirty donkey dicks.

>>64222548
>but actually sucks huge dirty donkey dicks.

But enough about your mom

>>64216188 (OP)
The only one of them that has successfully built trijets - and who still does in year 2025 and beyond : >>64216469
Dassault Aviation

>>64219758
tsmt

>>64216449
>Waters of India are natural brown
The jokes write themselves

>>64216188 (OP)
Sukhoi. Cargo cult shit is always kino. SAAB is a razor's edge second simply due to how many aesthetic aircraft they've made. Never a bad one.