>>64464735
>It's better for the species at large if people still want to try and de-escalate and avoid things getting that far.
Yes.
Absolutes are inflexible and dangerous, rules must be flexible or sometimes broken, including moral rules...if your goal is survival of the species/society/culture anyway.
I read an idea recently that the ideal long-term civilisation is one with vague laws that can be easily interpreted to the needs of the moment ruled by principle-less sociopaths who can justify any crime they commit, so as to always be able to take the optimal decision in all situations, unconstrained by cultural limitations.
If you have any consistent and coherent answer to the trolley problem then a scenario can be designed where you're forced to make the wrong decision for moral reasons.
Or at least you get to feel guilty about doing the right thing.