>>40114414>And as I said, happy children tend to kill themselves lessWhich is a nice generalize heuristic that doesn't survive the specific case of GAC.
>Post the evidenceDOI 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300940
>the proportion of suicides was higher in the gender-referred group (0.3% vs 0.1%)You'll note that the researchers themselves describe this as too small a difference to be broadly meaningful to conclude GAC is actually worse, but the fact remains that what data does exist is not favorable for GAC as a suicide reduction. Which again, is what doctors and therapists have been telling parents for 10+ years.
>If you didn't think that accepting trannies was bad policyI don't have any problem accepting trannies, where acceptance means generally using preferred pronouns and allowing adults to do what they wish within the bounds of existing law without compelling behavior from others.
>How come when evidence supports your claimsMy claim is that there is no evidence, and what evidence there is is not favorable. That's disjoint with the pigeonhole you're trying to create here. Exercise to the reader for how and why.
What's crazy is how people on this board like
>>40114210 slackjaw-guffaw about chuds being conspiracy theorists while being so disconnected from the state of the research and the rottenness of the claims of their own medical pathways they complete the caricature they mock.